Measuring quality of life in chronic pelvic pain syndrome

In: Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2009 · vol. 5(1) , pp. 115–124 · doi:10.1586/eog.09.70 · W2133047677
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review examines generic and disease-specific instruments for evaluating health-related quality of life in chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients, aiding clinicians and researchers in assessment and outcome optimization.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The evaluation of health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome is a challenging problem owing to the complexity of the underlying diagnoses and the multitude of instruments available. QoL may seem an obvious concept overall, generally encompassing physical functioning, social interactions and psychological wellbeing, but providing quantitative measures can be challenging and involves assurance of both face validity and psychometric statistical robustness. In addition to generic QoL measures, chronic pelvic pain-related disease-specific measures for endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome and vulvodynia can assist in identification of multiple concurrent diagnoses. This article reviews recent advances in QoL evaluation of chronic pelvic pain, and describes the features of both the generic and disease-specific instruments available to assist clinicians and researchers in evaluating patients and optimizing outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paininterstitial_cystitisirritable_bowel_syndrome

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (67)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:36:33.011116+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK