Association of uterine wall thickness with pregnancy outcome following uterine‐sparing surgery for diffuse uterine adenomyosis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 31 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study found that uterine wall thickness after surgery for adenomyosis was associated with pregnancy outcomes, with thicknesses between 9-15 mm possibly optimizing conception and preventing rupture.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of uterine rupture is a major concern for women who become pregnant after undergoing an adenomyomectomy. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of uterine wall thickness with pregnancy outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Uterine wall thickness was measured using sonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in 23 pregnant women who underwent uterine-sparing surgery for diffuse uterine adenomyosis prior to conception. RESULTS: Of the 23 women, 10 (43.5%) had an early miscarriage and 13 (56.5%) proceeded to delivery. Of the ten early miscarriage cases, two had a uterine rupture caused by excision of the uterine wall to within 7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Wall thickness of the excised uterus was highly associated with uterine rupture. We concluded that optimum wall thickness for conception and preventing uterine rupture during pregnancy may range from 9 to 15 mm.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Abortion, Spontaneous Adenomyosis Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Postoperative Complications Uterine Rupture Uterus Abortion, Spontaneous Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adult Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Postoperative Complications Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Risk Factors Ultrasonography, Prenatal Uterine Rupture Uterus

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (8)

Cited by (31)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:33.600579+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK