Endometriosis, subclinical cardiac remodeling, and cardiovascular risk: mechanistic insights from cardiac magnetic resonance and mediation analysis
Endometriosis is linked to increased cardiovascular disease risk and subclinical cardiac remodeling, primarily through metabolic and inflammatory pathways, as shown by UK Biobank data and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Using UK Biobank data (6,158 women with endometriosis and 229,453 without) plus an external hospital cohort (612 laparoscopically confirmed cases with age-matched controls), the study assessed associations between endometriosis and cardiovascular disease outcomes via multivariable-adjusted Cox models, and evaluated cardiac magnetic resonance metrics for subclinical remodeling. Over a median 13-year follow-up, endometriosis was associated with higher risk of CVD (HR 1.18) and coronary heart disease (HR 1.25), with stroke also significantly increased in replication; CMR showed subclinical concentric remodeling such as greater interventricular septal thickness and relative wall mass. Mediation analyses incorporating 32 biomarkers indicated metabolic dysfunction as the dominant pathway, with triglyceride-glucose–related indices and lipid accumulation product contributing most, followed by inflammation and oxidative stress. The paper explicitly notes mechanism is inferred from mediation models rather than direct causal experiments, and it includes validation across cohorts but relies on observational data. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it links endometriosis to increased cardiovascular risk and early subclinical cardiac remodeling using CMR and biomarker mediation analyses.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,893 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-14T06:03:42.337711+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine