Nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision of deep endometriosis involving the bowel: a single-center experience on 371 consecutives cases

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 17 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-09

Nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision effectively treats selected rectal nodules in deep endometriosis, significantly improving symptoms with an acceptable complication rate.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This retrospective single-center study evaluated 371 consecutive patients with suspected bowel deep endometriosis who had failed multiple medical treatments and underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing deep endometriosis eradication with concomitant rectal disc excision when rectal nodules were <3 cm and without substantial full-thickness infiltration. Key outcomes included early procedure-related complications—most notably 12.7% acute rectal bleeding managed endoscopically, with low rates of bowel anastomotic dehiscence (0.8%), hemoperitoneum (2.2%), and ureteral fistula (0.8%)—and an overall symptom improvement postoperatively (p<0.0001), with a low bowel recurrence rate of 2.2% over a median 60-month follow-up. The study’s main limitation is its retrospective, single-center design, and selection appears constrained to smaller rectal lesions suitable for disc excision without full-thickness involvement. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically reports nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision outcomes for bowel deep endometriosis involving rectal nodules.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundBowel endometriosis is the most common pattern of Deep Endometriosis (DE). Arising from the posterior portion of the cervix and spreading to the recto-vaginal septum, utero-sacral and parametrial ligaments could lead to a distortion of normal pelvic anatomy, causing pain and infertility. Hormonal therapy is the first-line treatment in non-symptomatic patient. Conversely, laparoscopic surgical treatment has to be considered when symptoms relief are not optimal or with signs of bowel occlusion.MethodsRetrospective experience of consecutive series of patients who referred to a third-level referral center with suspected bowel DE and failure of multiple medical treatments. After an intraoperative evaluation of nodule size with a rectal shaving of its external portion, patients underwent radical DE eradication with concomitant disc excision in rectal nodules < 3 cm with no signs of substantial full-thickness infiltration.ResultsA total of 371 patients were considered eligible for analysis, with a median age of 37 years. The median operative time of was 180 min, with an estimated blood loss of 100 mL and a median diameter of removed rectal nodule of 25 mm. Early postoperative procedure-related complications were 47 cases of acute rectal bleeding (12.7%), that were managed by rectal endoscopy, 3 bowel anastomotic dehiscence (0.8%), 8 hemoperitoneum (2.2%) and 3 ureteral fistula (0.8%). 22 patients experienced postoperative hyperpyrexia (5.9%), while 17 women underwent transient bladder deficiency (4.6%). Median follow-up was 60 months with a bowel recurrence rate of 2.2%. There was an improvement of all symptoms in the immediate postoperative follow-up (p < 0.0001). Among all patients with childbearing desire, the pregnancy rate found was 42.2% and was obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques in 32% of cases.ConclusionsLaparoscopic disc excision for bowel endometriosis is an effective surgical treatment in selected residual rectal nodules < 3.0 cm. The concomitant radical DE excision contributes to a significant improvement of symptoms with an acceptable complications' rate.
Full text 9,280 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Bowel endometriosis is the most common pattern of Deep Endometriosis (DE). Arising from the posterior portion of the cervix and spreading to the recto-vaginal septum, utero-sacral and parametrial ligaments could lead to a distortion of normal pelvic anatomy, causing pain and infertility. Hormonal therapy is the first-line treatment in non-symptomatic patient. Conversely, laparoscopic surgical treatment has to be considered when symptoms relief are not optimal or with signs of bowel occlusion.

Methods

Retrospective experience of consecutive series of patients who referred to a third-level referral center with suspected bowel DE and failure of multiple medical treatments. After an intraoperative evaluation of nodule size with a rectal shaving of its external portion, patients underwent radical DE eradication with concomitant disc excision in rectal nodules < 3 cm with no signs of substantial full-thickness infiltration.

Results

A total of 371 patients were considered eligible for analysis, with a median age of 37 years. The median operative time of was 180 min, with an estimated blood loss of 100 mL and a median diameter of removed rectal nodule of 25 mm. Early postoperative procedure-related complications were 47 cases of acute rectal bleeding (12.7%), that were managed by rectal endoscopy, 3 bowel anastomotic dehiscence (0.8%), 8 hemoperitoneum (2.2%) and 3 ureteral fistula (0.8%). 22 patients experienced postoperative hyperpyrexia (5.9%), while 17 women underwent transient bladder deficiency (4.6%). Median follow-up was 60 months with a bowel recurrence rate of 2.2%. There was an improvement of all symptoms in the immediate postoperative follow-up (p < 0.0001). Among all patients with childbearing desire, the pregnancy rate found was 42.2% and was obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques in 32% of cases.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic disc excision for bowel endometriosis is an effective surgical treatment in selected residual rectal nodules < 3.0 cm. The concomitant radical DE excision contributes to a significant improvement of symptoms with an acceptable complications’ rate. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Giudice LC (2010) Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 362:2389–2398 Working group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES, Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, Feki A, Grimbizis GF, Hummelshoj L, Nisolle M, Roman H, Saridogan E, Tanos V, Tomassetti C, Ulrich UA, Vermeulen N, De Wilde RL (2020) Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa002 Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21(3):329–339 Abrão MS, Borrelli GM, Clarizia R, Kho RM, Ceccaroni M (2017) Strategies for management of colorectal endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med 35(1):65–71 Nezhat C, Li A, Falik R et al (2018) Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218(6):549–562 Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Manzoni A et al (2014) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic bowel resections for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a single-center experience after 900 cases. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/463058 Donnez O, Roman H (2017) Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril 108(6):931–942 Ceccaroni M, Ceccarello M, Caleffi G, Clarizia R, Scarperi S, Pastorello M, Molinari A, Ruffo G, Cavalleri S (2018) Total laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral endometriosis: a single-center experience of 160 consecutive patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26:78–86 Rossini R, Lisi G, Pesci A, Ceccaroni M, Zamboni G, Gentile I, Rettore L, Ruffo G (2018) Depth of intestinal wall infiltration and clinical presentation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: evaluation of 553 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(2):152–156 Vercellini P, Buggio L, Borghi A, Monti E, Gattei U, Frattaruolo MP (2018) Medical treatment in the management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum and sigmoid colon: a comprehensive literature review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97:942–955 Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Dubuisson JB, Barakat H, Vieira M, Breart G (2003) Deep infiltrating endometriosis: relation between severity of dysmenorrhea and extent of disease. Hum Reprod 18:760–766 Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F et al (2012) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 26:2029–2045 de Almeida A, Fernandes LF, Averbach M, Abrão MS (2014) Disc resection is the first option in the management of rectal endometriosis for unifocal lesions with less than 3 centimeters of longitudinal diameter. Surg Technol Int 24:243–248 Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML et al (2010) Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case control study. Fertil Steril 94(2):444–449 Roman H, Tuech JJ (2014) New disc excision procedure for low and mid rectal endometriosis nodules using combined transanal and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 16(7):253–256 Roman H, Abo C, Huet E et al (2015) Full-thickness disc excision in deep endometriotic nodules of the rectum: a prospective cohort. Dis Colon Rectum 58(10):957–966 Roman H, Darwish B, Bridoux V et al (2017) Functional outcomes after disc excision in deep endometriosis of the rectum using transanal staplers: a series of 111 consecutive patients. Fertil Steril 107:977–986 Oliveira MA, Crispi CP, Oliveira FM, Junior PS, Raymundo TS, Pereira TD (2014) Double circular stapler technique for bowel resection in rectosigmoid endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):136–141 Kondo W, Ribeiro R, Zomer MT, Hayashi R (2015) Laparoscopic double discoid resection with a double circular stapler for bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:929–931 Canis M, Donnez JG, Guzick DS, Halme JK, Rock JA, Schenken RS, Vernon MW (1997) Revised american society for reproductive medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 67(5):817–821 Vanhie A, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C et al (2016) Consensus on recording deep endometriosis surgery: the CORDES statement. Hum Reprod 31(6):1219–1223 Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G (2013) Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 27:4386–4394 Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Scioscia M, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Minelli L (2010) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical excision of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(1):14–15 Abo C, Bendifallah S, Jayot A, Nyangoh Timoh K, Tuech JJ, Roman H, Daraï E (2019) Discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: results from a prospective cohort from two French tertiary referral centres. Colorectal Dis 21(11):1312–1320 Hudelist G, Aas-Eng MK, Birsan T, Berger F, Sevelda U, Kirchner L, Salama M, Dauser B (2018) Pain and fertility outcomes of nerve-sparing, full-thickness disk or segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis—a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97(12):1438–1446 Jayot A, Bendifallah S, Abo C, Arfi A, Owen C, Darai E (2020) Feasibility, complications, and recurrence after discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: a series of 93 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(1):212–219 Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N, Saint Ghislain M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Tuech JJ, Roman H (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 109(1):172–178 de Resende Júnior JAD, Crispi CP, Cardeman L, Buere RT, Fonseca MF (2018) Urodynamic observations and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with endometriosis: a prospective cross-sectional observational study assessing women with deep infiltrating disease. Int Urogynecol J 29(9):1349–1358 Iversen ML, Seyer-Hansen M, Forman A (2017) Does surgery for deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis improve fertility? A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(6):688–693 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Disclosures Marcello Ceccaroni, Matteo Ceccarello, Roberto Clarizia, Enrico Fusco, Giovanni Roviglione, Daniele Mautone, Camilla Cavallero, Simone Orlandi, Roberto Rossini, Giuliano Barugola, Giacomo Ruffo declares no conflict of interest. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Ceccaroni, M., Ceccarello, M., Clarizia, R. et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision of deep endometriosis involving the bowel: a single-center experience on 371 consecutives cases. Surg Endosc 35, 5991–6000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08084-4 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08084-4

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Digestive System Surgical Procedures Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Adult Female Humans Postoperative Complications Postoperative Complications Postoperative Complications Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (57)

Cited by (17)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-06-25T06:33:54.860389+00:00
europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:36.268089+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-23T06:29:45.520198+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK