VOIDING DYSFUNCTION AFTER ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: A SYSTEMACTIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colorectal endometriosis shows a lower incidence of immediate and persistent voiding dysfunction compared to conventional laparoscopy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of voiding dysfunction (VD) after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with colorectal involvement and to compare outcomes between conventional laparoscopy (CL) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS).
DATA SOURCES: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included prospective, retrospective, or randomized trials reporting VD after RALS for colorectal endometriosis. VD was defined according to reported criteria, including need for intermittent self-catheterization, subjective dysuria, or postoperative residual bladder volume >100 mL. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis and ten for the meta-analysis, comprising 728 patients (225 CL; 503 RALS). Overall VD was observed in 52 patients (7.1%). VD was less frequent after RALS than CL (4.4% vs 13.3%; RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.56; p1 month) was evaluable in 458 patients and occurred in 7.6%. Persistent VD was reduced after RALS (5.2% vs 10.2%; RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26-0.99; p=0.041; I²=60.1%).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that RALS surgery for colorectal endometriosis was associated with a lower risk of both immediate and persistent VD compared with CL. These findings support the preferential consideration of RALS in patients requiring DIE surgery with a high VD risk.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:15:44.054944+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:07:16.079658+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:09:10.261930+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:36:06.991349+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine