Ursachen von Endometriose: Schlussfolgerungen aus Praxiserfahrung und Nachuntersuchung

In: Zeitschrift für Komplementärmedizin · 2010 · vol. 2(01) , pp. 18–21 · doi:10.1055/s-0029-1240761 · W1966481910
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper analyzes treatment outcomes from 695 endometriosis patients over 15 years to draw conclusions about the disease's causes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

The paper evaluates treatment outcomes from 695 women followed over 15 years in a practice-based review, aiming to draw inferences about causes of endometriosis. It frames endometriosis as potentially linked to factors such as inflammation, immune deficiency, and infectious exposures, with specific keywords referencing infections (e.g., Chlamydia, Ureaplasma urealyticum), and HPV, along with environmental influences. A major limitation is that the study is based on real-world practice experience and retrospective follow-up rather than a controlled design, which constrains causal conclusions. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it uses long-term practice follow-up to discuss proposed causes, including immune, infectious, and environmental factors.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Die Endometriose kann schwerwiegende Symptome verursachen, die für die Patientinnen häufig sehr belastend sind. Im folgenden Beitrag werden die Behandlungsergebnisse von 695 Patientinnen aus einem Zeitraum von 15 Jahren ausgewertet, die Rückschlüsse auf die Ursachen der Endometriose zulassen.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

die_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (12)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK