Sociodemographic and menstrual profile of infertile women with endometriosis: a comparative cross-sectional analysis from a tertiary centre in Rajasthan

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · vol. 15(10) , pp. 3989–3993 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263436 · W7214583931
article OA: diamond CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-03 ⓘ

This study found that infertile women with endometriosis in Rajasthan had higher socioeconomic status, lower BMI, and shorter menstrual cycles compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-03 · read from full text ⓘ

This cross-sectional study compared sociodemographic and menstrual profiles of 60 infertile women, dividing them into groups with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and controls at a tertiary care center in Rajasthan. The results indicated that women with endometriosis had significantly higher socioeconomic status, lower body mass index, and shorter menstrual cycle lengths compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed regarding age, religion, literacy, or parity between the two cohorts. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically examining its association with specific sociodemographic and menstrual characteristics in an infertile population.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis disproportionately affects women during their reproductive years and has been associated with various sociodemographic and menstrual factors. Understanding these associations is critical for early identification and improved public health strategies, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Data on the sociodemographic profile of endometriosis from North India remain sparse. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional comparative observational study of 60 infertile women (30 with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and 30 controls) was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Jaipur, between July 2023 and July 2025. Demographic, anthropometric, and menstrual data were collected. Chi-square, Fisher exact test, and unpaired t-test were used for analysis. Results: No significant age difference was found between cases (mean 28.01±4.78 yrs) and controls (28.73±5.13 yrs; p=0.604). Women with endometriosis were significantly more likely to belong to higher socioeconomic status (53.33% upper class vs. 26.66% in controls; p=0.043) and had significantly lower BMI (21.26±2.91 vs. 23.26±3.26 kg/m²; p=0.0147). Shorter menstrual cycle length was significantly associated with endometriosis (mean 26.97±3.91 vs. 30.13±4.66 days; p=0.0013). No significant differences in religion, literacy, or parity were observed. Conclusions: Higher socioeconomic status, lower BMI, and shorter menstrual cycle length are significantly associated with endometriosis in infertile women. These factors may serve as clinical flags to prompt earlier investigation in appropriate patient populations.
Full text 5,547 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Endometriosis disproportionately affects women during their reproductive years and has been associated with various sociodemographic and menstrual factors. Understanding these associations is critical for early identification and improved public health strategies, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Data on the sociodemographic profile of endometriosis from North India remain sparse.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional comparative observational study of 60 infertile women (30 with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and 30 controls) was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Jaipur, between July 2023 and July 2025. Demographic, anthropometric, and menstrual data were collected. Chi-square, Fisher exact test, and unpaired t-test were used for analysis.

Results

No significant age difference was found between cases (mean 28.01±4.78 yrs) and controls (28.73±5.13 yrs; p=0.604). Women with endometriosis were significantly more likely to belong to higher socioeconomic status (53.33% upper class vs. 26.66% in controls; p=0.043) and had significantly lower BMI (21.26±2.91 vs. 23.26±3.26 kg/m²; p=0.0147). Shorter menstrual cycle length was significantly associated with endometriosis (mean 26.97±3.91 vs. 30.13±4.66 days; p=0.0013). No significant differences in religion, literacy, or parity were observed.

Conclusions

Higher socioeconomic status, lower BMI, and shorter menstrual cycle length are significantly associated with endometriosis in infertile women. These factors may serve as clinical flags to prompt earlier investigation in appropriate patient populations. Metrics

References

Tsamantioti ES, Mahdy H. Endometriosis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Udupa KS, Phukan P, Saikia N, Dutta A. Study on epidemiology of endometriosis in North East India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12:1770-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231552 Ramani Devi T, Kadalmani B, Anchana Devi C. Epidemiology of Endometriosis in Tamil Nadu, India. APJHS. 2022;9(3):15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2022.9.3.04 Chandra R, Soumya, Jakhar A. Association between endometriosis and hyperprolactinemia in infertile women. Int J Current Research. 2020;12(12):15218-21. Hediger ML, Hartnett HJ, Louis GMB. Association of endometriosis with body size and figure. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1366-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.029 Wei M, Cheng Y, Bu H, Zhao Y, Zhao W. Length of menstrual cycle and risk of endometriosis: a meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(9):e2922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002922 Eisenberg VH, Weil C, Chodick G, Shalev V. Epidemiology of endometriosis: a large population-based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG. 2018;125(1):55-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14711 Jenabi E, Fereidooni B, Khazaei S. The association between parity and the risk of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Erciyes Med J. 2021;43(3):228-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2020.25874 Cardoso JV, Machado DE, da Silva MC, Berardo PT, Ferrari R, Abrão MS, et al. Epidemiological profile of women with endometriosis: a retrospective descriptive study. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2020;20(4):1057-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000400008 Esmaeilzadeh S, Mirabi P, Basirat Z, Zeinalzadeh M, Khafri S. Association between endometriosis and hyperprolactinemia in infertile women. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13(3):155-60. Parasar P, Ozcan P, Terry KL. Endometriosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;6(1):34-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-017-0187-1 De Corte P, Klinghardt M, von Stockum S, Heinemann K. Time to diagnose endometriosis: current status, challenges and regional characteristics-a systematic literature review. BJOG. 2025;132(2):118-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17973 Fryer J, Mason-Jones AJ, Woodward A. Understanding diagnostic delay for endometriosis: A scoping review. MedrXiv. 2024:2024-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.08.24300988 Liu F, Yuan S, Yan Q, Yang S, Yan W, Xiang T, et al. Global trends in endometriosis burden, 1990-2021: a sociodemographic analysis using GBD 2021 data and projections to 2036. Int J Womens Health. 2026;18:560463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S560463 Yu X, Shi L, Deng X, Zhang Y, Wang H. Global burden of endometriosis from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050: a comprehensive analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front Glob Womens Health. 2025;6:1613468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1613468 Milla H, Ritonga MA, Bayuaji H, Heriyanto A, Direza FH. Association between body fat percentage and endometriosis severity based on American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2021 endometriosis classification. Int J Womens Health. 2026;18:582542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S582542 Downloads Published How to Cite Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2026 Shivangi Yadav, Nupur Lauria, Anchal, Manisha Kumari This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-06T06:07:52.081803+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK