Clinical analysis of high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis: a 4-year experience at a specialty gynecological institution

Zhang Xiao-Ying, Xiao-Ying Z, Hua D, Duan Hua, Hua Duan, Jin-Juan W, Jinjuan Wang, Wang Jin-Juan, Ying-Shu G, Guo Ying-Shu, Cheng Jiu-Mei, Jiu-Mei C, Jiumei Cheng, Hong Y, Ye Hong, Hong Ye, Chun-Yi Z, Chunyi Zang, Zang Chun-Yi
International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2018 · vol. 36(1) , pp. 87–94 · doi:10.1080/02656736.2018.1534276 · PMID:30428731 · W2901695007
article OA: hybrid CC0 ⤵ 26 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study analyzed 51 women treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound for abdominal wall endometriosis, finding a 3.9% recurrence rate and no severe complications over a 4-year follow-up.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical effect of high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) as a non-invasive modality for ablation of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) foci.Methods: All women who were diagnosed with cutaneous endometriosis and underwent HIFU ablation and 4-year follow-up were included. Patient symptoms, imaging performed, HIFU ablation, recurrence, lesion location, size and number were collected and analyzed.Results: A total of 51 women with 57 painful abdominal wall masses with a median volume of 4.00 cm3 and a mean age of 30.5±2.12 years were treated with HIFU. The main symptoms were a palpable painful abdominal mass (93%), protrusion of the skin (28.1%, 16) or lack of protrusion of the skin (71.9%, 41). Ultrasound was initially performed in 100% (51) of women, whereas 6% (3) required MRI examinations to distinguish the features and range of the masses. Ablation was performed with a median 300 s of sonication time, 40 min treatment time, 150 W of power and 41800 J of total energy to treat lesions that were a median volume of 3.83 cm3. No severe complications occurred, except in one patient with a first-degree skin burn, during the 48-month follow-up period. The pooled recurrence of cutaneous endometriosis occurred in 3.9% (2) of women.Conclusion: The diagnosis of AWE should be confirmed with imaging of the lesion number, location, size and features before HIFU ablation. HIFU should be the first choice for the treatment of AWE as it is a non-invasive method, with high efficiency and safety and rapid postoperative recovery.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Female High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Humans Time Factors Young Adult

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (29)

Cited by (24)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:10:54.854274+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:25.021412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK