Australian healthcare professionals' beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey

Jennifer Vardy, Edwina Chan, Marika Hart, Rebecca Dallin, Emma Wise, Emmanuel Karantanis, Darren Beales
Australian journal of primary health · 2024 · vol. 30(5) · doi:10.1071/py24046 · PMID:39283976 · W4402549370
Observational OA: hybrid CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This Australian survey found that physiotherapists felt more confident and knowledgeable managing chronic pelvic pain than GPs and gynaecologists, though all professions recognized biopsychosocial factors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition, and sufferers present to healthcare professionals with variable complex symptoms and co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate the current beliefs and practice behaviours of healthcare professionals towards the management of CPP in Australian females. Methods We distributed an online survey to Australian healthcare professionals. Participants were questioned regarding their beliefs, the importance of various contributing factors and assessment variables, and their management preferences for two CPP vignettes. Demographic information and responses were analysed with descriptive statistics. Results Complete data were obtained and analysed from 446 respondents including gynaecologists (n =75), general practitioners (GPs) (n =184) and physiotherapists (n =187). Most of the respondents were female (88.1%), with male (11.7%) and other (0.2%) making up a smaller representation. Physiotherapists rated themselves higher in understanding mechanisms of CPP (64.7% very good to excellent) compared to gynaecologists (41.3%) and GPs (22.8%). Physiotherapists also reported higher levels of confidence in managing patients with CPP (57.8% quite or extremely confident) compared to 41.3% of gynaecologists and 22.3% of GPs who reported being quite or extremely confident. All three professions rated patient's beliefs (89.8%), nervous system sensitisation (85.7%), stress/anxiety/depression (91.9%), fear avoidance (83.3%), history of sexual/emotional/physical abuse (94.1%) and pelvic floor muscle function (85.0%) as very/extremely important factors in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Most gynaecologists (71.0%) and GPs (70.2%) always referred for pelvic ultrasound during assessment. Physiotherapists assessed goal setting (88.8%) and screened for patients' beliefs (80.9%) more often than gynaecologists (30.4% and 39.1% respectively) and GPs (46.5% and 29.0% respectively). Conclusions All three groups of healthcare professionals demonstrated a good understanding of pain mechanisms and incorporated a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to management of females with chronic pelvic pain. However, both gynaecologists and GPs were less confident in their understanding of and management of CPP, and less likely to consider patient beliefs and goals. The findings of this online survey may assist in the provision of more targeted education to further improve management of this condition.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Attitude of Health Personnel Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Adult Australia Cross-Sectional Studies Female General Practitioners General Practitioners General Practitioners Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Personnel Health Personnel Health Personnel Humans Male

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (22)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:45:41.987887+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK