Let Them Bleed: How Medical Discrimination Keeps Women with Endometriosis and Other Gynecology-Related Diseases and Disorders from Accessing Care

In: Carleton University · 2022 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-16103 · W4401632824
dissertation OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This paper examines how medical discrimination obstructs access to care for women with endometriosis and other gynecology-related diseases and disorders.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This extensively sourced thesis examines how people with endometriosis experience routine, layered discrimination when trying to access medical care, arguing that longstanding white male supremacy in medicine and society has produced asymmetrical power dynamics that diminish patients’ autonomy and agency. Using a narrative evidence base drawn from memoir, interviews, journals, books, and media reports, it traces historical ideas about women—especially women marginalized by factors beyond sex and gender—that continue to shape contemporary endometriosis care experiences. The central caveat is that the work is framed as a qualitative, historically contextualized synthesis rather than a study generating quantitative clinical outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses specifically on how medical discrimination affects access to care for people with endometriosis and related gynecology-related diseases.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

How medical discrimination keeps women with
Full text 1,058 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Let Them Bleed: How Medical Discrimination Keeps Women with Endometriosis and Other Gynecology-Related Diseases and Disorders from Accessing Care Date Authors Editors Journal Title Journal ISSN Volume Title Publisher Abstract The aim of this thesis is to examine how people with endometriosis routinely experience layers of discrimination when attempting to access medical care. My central argument is that the millennia-long history of white, male supremacy in medicine, and in broader society, have conspired to rob endometriosis patients of autonomy and agency within a system defined by asymmetrical power dynamics. By pulling the threads of history, we can see how seemingly antiquated ideas about women—and particularly women marginalized by additional factors beyond sex and gender—remain part of the modern experience of endometriosis care. Using memoir, interviews, journals, books and media reports, this extensively sourced thesis weaves together an alarming portrait of the systemic forces that fail people with endometriosis time and time again.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK