Magnetic Resonance Enterography to Assess Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Endometriosis

Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Nyangoh Timoh K, Zelda Stewart, Stewart Z, Benjoar M, Mikhael Benjoar, Beldjord S, Selma Beldjord, Marcos Ballester, Ballester M, Marc Bazot, Bazot M, Isabelle Thomassin‐Naggara, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Thomassin-Naggara I, Emile Darai, Darai E, Émile Daraï
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 25(4) , pp. 697–705 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.037 · PMID:29158158 · W2769126463
Diagnostic accuracy OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 14 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study utilized magnetic resonance enterography to assess the effectiveness of this imaging technique in identifying multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (i.e., multiple lesions affecting the same digestive segment) and multicentric (i.e., multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis. DESIGN: A prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. PATIENTS: Patients with MRI-suspected colorectal endometriosis scheduled for colorectal resection from April 2014 to February 2016 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent both 1.5-Tesla MRI and MRE as well as laparoscopically assisted and open colorectal resections. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of MRI and MRE was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). The interobserver variability of the experienced and junior radiologists was quantified using weighted statistics. Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients had unifocal lesions, 14 (30%) had multifocal lesions, and 11 (23.4%) had multicentric lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.29 (6/21), 1.00 (23/24), 15.36, and 0.71 for MRI and 0.57 (12/21), 0.89 (23/25), 4.95, and 0.58 for MRE. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 0.18 (1/11), 1.00 (1/1), 15, and 0.80 for MRI and 0.46 (5/11), 0.92 (33/36), 5.45, and 0.60 for MRE. Lower accuracies for MRI compared with MRE to diagnose multicentric (p = .01) and multifocal lesions (p = .004) were noted. The interobserver agreement for MRE was good for both multifocality (κ = 0.80) and multicentricity (κ = 0.61). CONCLUSION: MRE has better accuracy for diagnosing multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis than conventional MRI.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Colonic Diseases Endometriosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rectal Diseases Adult Adult Colonic Diseases Colonic Diseases Colonic Diseases Contrast Media Contrast Media Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Gadolinium Gadolinium Humans Humans

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (32)

Cited by (14)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:20:50.926721+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK