Clinical Outcome in Female Patients with Pelvic Pain and Normal Pelvic US Findings

Robert D. Harris, Harris RD, R D Harris, S R Holtzman, Stephen R. Holtzman, Holtzman SR, Poppe AM, Angela M. Poppe, A M Poppe
Radiology · 2000 · vol. 216(2) , pp. 440–443 · doi:10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au22440 · PMID:10924567 · W2095761855
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 18 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-22 ⓘ

Most female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic ultrasound findings experienced symptom improvement, especially those with acute or subacute pain, with further imaging rarely revealing significant disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the clinical outcome in patients with pelvic pain and negative pelvic ultrasonographic (US) findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 86 female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings seen in a US section over a 15-month period were evaluated 6–21 months after US. Medical chart review follow-up was available in 86 patients, and telephone interview follow-up was conducted in 85 patients. We collected data on the outcome of pain; subsequent imaging, treatment, and surgery; and the duration of pain before US. RESULTS: Pelvic pain improved or resolved in 66 (77%) of the 86 patients. In the group with acute or subacute pain (duration ≤ 6 months), 62 (86%) of the 72 patients (19 with acute pain and 53 with subacute pain) had improvement or resolution of symptoms. In the group with chronic pain (duration > 6 months), seven (50%) of the 14 patients had improved symptoms. Further imaging (13 studies) was performed in nine patients: Twelve studies were normal, and one computed tomographic scan (1 month after the first US examination) showed diverticulitis. Eleven patients underwent 19 surgical procedures (endometrial sampling, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or hysterectomy). Four demonstrated clinically important disease (endometriosis and pelvic varices, endometriosis, adenomyosis, or pelvic adhesions). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings had improvement or resolution of their symptoms, and those with acute or subacute pain were more likely to report improvement or resolution of pain than those with chronic pain. The yield of further imaging studies was low, and disease was identified in a minority of patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_painadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Pelvic Pain Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Biopsy Chronic Disease Diagnosis, Differential Diagnostic Imaging Diverticulitis, Colonic Diverticulitis, Colonic Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Hysterectomy Hysteroscopy Interviews as Topic Laparoscopy Middle Aged

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Cited by (18)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-04T06:16:37.499272+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:36.046895+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK