Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for severe deep endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ROBEndo trial)
article
OA: gold
CC0
⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This randomized controlled trial compares robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis, measuring pain relief and other outcomes over two years.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease affecting around 10% of fertile-aged women, causing severe pain symptoms. Deep endometriosis is defined as endometriotic implants that infiltrate the underlying organs more than 5 mm in depth. Surgery for deep endometriosis requires advanced multidisciplinary surgical technique, often in very difficult surgical conditions, with increased risks of complications. Robotic surgery offers a high-definition three-dimensional view and articulating instruments that may allow more precise dissection than conventional laparoscopy in the pelvic area. The superiority of robotic surgery has not, however, been provedin randomised controlled studies, and there is a lack of long-term outcome data. Advanced endometriosis surgery offers an excellent platform to study the feasibility and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ROBEndo is a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial in a single-centre setting. Patients with deep endometriosis verified by MRI needing surgery at Oulu University Hospital (Oulu, Finland) will be considered eligible. 70 patients will be allocated 1:1 to receive either robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery in two strata: radical surgery (with the removal of the uterus and adnexae) and gynaecological organ-sparing surgery. The primary outcome will be the surgical outcome as regards to pain symptoms measured on numeric rating scale (NRS) questionnaires at 24 hours and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. As secondary outcomes, intraoperative measures, enhanced recovery after surgery factors, complications, cost and long-term quality of life measured with Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and 15-dimensional (15D) questionnaires will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Northern Ostrobothnian Hospital District Ethical Committee at Oulu University Hospital (212/2021). Informed consent will be obtained during the preoperative check-up by the operating gynaecologist. The results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05179109.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (21)
- Comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: Pilot study of an expert center via openalex
- Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial via openalex
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopy Surgery for Advanced-Stage Endometriosis via openalex
- Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis†‡¶ via openalex
- Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Advanced Stage Endometriosis via openalex
- Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review via openalex
- Robotic surgery in gynecology via openalex
- Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- Surgical Excision of Advanced Endometriosis: Perioperative Outcomes and Impacting Factors via openalex
- Surgical Excision Versus Ablation for Superficial Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial via openalex
- W2793930585 via openalex
- W3004579253 via openalex
- W2143002689 via openalex
- W2078038082 via openalex
- W2002022249 via openalex
- W4211105553 via openalex
- W4234160457 via openalex
- W6749776551 via openalex
- W6773736238 via openalex
- W6774389680 via openalex
- W6808670820 via openalex
Cited by (10)
- Clinical diagnosis and treatment of bowel endometriosis and the distribution characteristics of lesions 2025
- Robotic multidisciplinary endometriosis surgery with multi‐visceral resection: evaluation of short‐term feasibility and safety outcomes 2025
- Current status of robot-assisted surgery implementation in endometriosis centers: an international multicentric cross-sectional study 2025
- Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Surgery Versus Traditional Surgery in the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Narrative Review 2024
- Postoperative Imaging of Endometriosis 2024
- Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in deep-infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement: a systematic review and application of the IDEAL framework 2024
- Endometriosis and robotic surgery 2024
- Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement: a systematic review and application of the IDEAL framework 2024
- Robotic Surgery for Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Approach 2023
- Enhancing Women's Health: Advancing Gynecological Laparoscopy in Resource-Limited Eastern Sudan 2023
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-25T00:34:41.078561+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK