Robotic Surgery for Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Approach

review OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This systematic review analyzed limited retrospective studies and case reports, finding robotic surgery feasible for bladder endometriosis with potential benefits like reduced pain and faster recovery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-15 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper systematically reviews the literature on robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis, searching multiple databases (and gray literature) using PRISMA-guided methods and including full-text case reports/series and interventional studies that reported technique, follow-up, and complications. Across 15 included sources (after screening 49 PubMed hits and substantially more records elsewhere), most evidence consisted of case reports showing that robotic resection is feasible with generally good results, and retrospective and comparative data indicating no clear differences versus conventional laparoscopy in blood loss, operative time, conversion to laparotomy, or complications, while explicitly noting the limitations of study heterogeneity and the paucity of robust comparative trials. A substantial caveat is that studies excluding ureteral involvement and the small number of eligible, report-follow-up articles constrain generalizability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically reviews robotic surgical management of bladder endometriosis and summarizes evidence, anatomical considerations, and comparative outcomes versus conventional laparoscopy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women with bladder endometriosis often present with more advanced stages of endometriosis. Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach to the management of bladder endometriosis. This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature on robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis and describe our systematic approach to surgical treatment. METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines, which ensured a comprehensive and transparent approach to selecting and evaluating relevant studies. We conducted a thorough literature search to identify studies that investigated the use of robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis. Relevant databases were searched, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select eligible studies. Data extraction and analysis were performed to assess the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic surgery for the treatment of bladder endometriosis. RESULTS: We did not find any randomized clinical trials with the use of robotics in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. We found only two retrospective studies comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy, and another retrospective study comparing robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. All the other 12 studies were solely case reports. Despite the lack of robust evidence in the literature, the studies demonstrated that robotic surgery is feasible and is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of robotic technology is a promising option for the surgical management of bladder endometriosis. We advocate a surgical systematic approach for the robotic treatment of bladder endometriosis. Robotic technology, with its 3D vision, instrumental degrees of freedom, and precision, particularly in suturing, may provide potential benefits over traditional laparoscopy.
Full text 19,861 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Section 4

The bladder is the urinary tract area most commonly affected by endometriosis [ 3 ]. Since BE pain overlaps with endometriosis pain symptoms from other locations and other pathologies such as bladder pain syndrome, a thorough evaluation is necessary. Seeking consultation with a urologist, pelvic physiotherapist, and/or pain specialist can assist in evaluating the differential diagnosis. It is crucial to understand and address patient expectations, regardless of whether they are experiencing pain, infertility, or an advanced disease with no complaints. Mapping disease extension is of utmost importance for either medical or surgical management. High-quality imaging exams, such as pelvic MRI or ultrasound, are important tools for diagnosis. Consultation with a urologist is advised for surgical planning. Identifying BE nodules preoperatively is important for patient counseling and for identifying cases where full-thickness excision is indicated and its distance to the ureteral ostia. When the disease is located either too close to one ostium or in the vesical trigone, the surgical team should be prepared for the necessity of ureteral stents or even reimplantation. Urinary tract endometriosis coexists with deep infiltrative endometriosis in other sites. When surgery is indicated, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. A minimally invasive approach is preferred over laparotomy, as it provides adequate visualization of both disease lesions and anatomical structures, besides having all the known advantages of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Transurethral resection must be avoided, as it does not provide complete nodule excision, favoring the maintenance of pain and disease persistence. Specifically, regarding urinary tract endometriosis, the suturing capability and instrumental degrees of freedom in robotic surgery provide possible advantages over conventional laparoscopy. Robotic suturing dexterity can overcome difficult angles the surgeon might find during bladder repair, especially when trigone lesions are resected. When ureteral reimplantation is necessary, robotic surgery, with its 3D vision and endowrist motion, may play an important role. With robotic aid, in cases where the distal portion of the ureter is affected and ureterolysis is not feasible, a good end-to-end anastomosis is achievable, even if it is a few centimeters away from entering the bladder. These cases are usually primarily managed by ureteroneocystostomy. Abdominal drainage is usually performed when the resection area is extensive, or the trigone suture was considered difficult. Bladder suturing can be performed in one or two layers, according to the surgeon’s preference. We usually perform a two-layer suture and perform a bladder distention test, filling it with saline and methylene blue dye to ensure that there is no leakage. Extensive bladder mobilization might be necessary to ensure that the suture is tension-free, to decrease the risk of dehiscence. Foley catheterization in the postoperative period depends on the surgeon’s decision and pelvic nerve trauma during surgery. It should be considered, as bladder atonia will lead to overdistention and may put the sutures at an increased risk of dehiscence. Antibiotics are not regularly used. We usually leave the catheter for a period of 5 to 15 days, depending on the extent of the surgery. A robotic platform is an important tool in endometriosis surgery. Robotic training is of paramount importance for increasing robotic usage in gynecology. With the development of newer platforms, it is likely the number of surgeries will increase as the number of certified surgeons increases.

Intro

Deep endometriosis (DE) is the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, infiltrating the peritoneum deeper than 5 mm [ 1 ]. Frequently, DE involves the uterosacral ligaments (66%), the vagina (17%), the intestine (9.5%), and the bladder (7.5%) [ 2 ]. When the urinary tract is compromised, the bladder and ureter are affected by 70 to 85% and 9 to 23%, respectively [ 3 ]. Bladder endometriosis (BE) is defined by the implantation of endometrial tissue into the detrusor muscle, affecting mostly the base and dome. In some cases, it can affect the ureteral ostium. Women with BE usually present with more advanced stages of endometriosis, including in extragenital sites, and 35% have urinary symptoms, such as urinary frequency, pain, and/or bleeding [ 4 ]. Some women may also experience urinary urgency, but less frequently. Women with dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain associated with those urinary complaints provide strong evidence of BE. The vaginal exam may identify palpable nodules or thickness at the anterior vaginal wall in some patients with BE [ 5 ]. Nevertheless, ultrasound (US) is a valuable tool in BE diagnosis because it is widely available, has low cost, has no radiation exposure, and has 62% sensibility and 100% specificity in detecting BE. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is excellent in mapping pelvic endometriosis with high accuracy in detecting BE, with 64% and 98% of sensibility and specificity, respectively [ 3 ]. Hormonal therapies may be used as a first step to control BE symptoms, but patients usually do not respond adequately due to the detrusor’s desmoplastic reactions [ 6 ]. Therefore, when medical therapies fail, a surgical approach with complete removal of the bladder lesion should be performed to alleviate the symptoms and decrease the risk of recurrence [ 7 ]. Two surgical procedures are described in the literature: transurethral resection (TUR), partial cystectomy, and sometimes a combination of both [ 6 ]. Nevertheless, TUR alone should not be used because endometriosis grows from outside (serosa and detrusor) toward the bladder mucosa, which makes it unachievable to completely excise the lesion [ 8 , 9 ]. Therefore, partial cystectomy seems to be the best approach in women with BE. Minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) is the preferred approach because of several benefits. It is associated with a lower incidence of surgical morbidity, less postoperative discomfort, and a shorter length of hospital stay. Due to the innovative features of robotic technology, which include an expanded three-dimensional view, a more comfortable working position for the surgeon, and more flexible and precise movements, it is possible to overcome the inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopy. As a result, it is appropriate for more complicated procedures, where extensive dissection and adequate restoration of the anatomy are required, such as endometriosis [ 10 , 11 ]. Some cases of urologic lesions, intestinal involvement, and also widespread peritoneal implants may benefit from a robotic approach [ 12 ]. The anatomical study of the bladder and its relationships is important to the knowledge of the main surgical steps of the treatment of bladder endometriosis (BE). It allows the surgeon to avoid undesired injuries and provide a better outcome with increased preservation of the bladder and its functionality. In adult females, the bladder is a pelvic organ overlaid partially by the peritoneum on the superior surface and is reflected over the uterus to form the vesicouterine reflection, a very common site for BE. Incision of the peritoneum at this level allows access to the posterior bladder wall and its dissection from the vagina, which is firmly attached to the base of the bladder. Anteriorly and laterally, the bladder is surrounded by fat up to the pubis and a virtual space, and this virtual space (Retzius or retropubic space) can be created by the dissection of the transversalis fascia anteriorly, providing access to the anterior wall of the bladder [ 13 ]. The anterior parietal peritoneum, lateral to the bladder, forms the superior border of the lateral paravesical space that creates the broad ligament in females. When it is dissected medially, it is possible to access the paravesical space at each side down to the iliac vessels, obturator fossa, and levator ani muscles. This maneuver is useful in the complete resection of a lesion that affects the bladder lateral wall, and it allows a tension-free suture [ 14 ]. The bladder has an ovoid shape and its tetrahedral form when fully filled holds around 500 mL. The three layers of smooth muscles (inner longitudinal, middle circular, and outer longitudinal) are considered the main structure of the bladder wall, and they are best known as the detrusor muscle. There is an anchor to the anterior abdominal wall, called the urachus, made of longitudinal smooth muscle bundles that are localized in the bladder apex [ 15 , 16 ]. We can divide the bladder into four anatomical areas: apex, base, body, and inferolateral surface. Both ureters enter the bladder wall posteriorly in a diagonal direction and form the ureteral orifice after penetrating the detrusor for 1.5 to 2.0 cm. The trigone is localized between the two ureteral orifices and is composed of longitudinal smooth muscle fibers and the urethra orifice. All these structures are at the base of the bladder. The lymphatic drainage passes to the external iliac, and some anterior and lateral drainage may go through the obturator and internal iliac nodes, whereas portions of the bladder base and trigone may drain [ 17 ]. Bladder innervation is made basically by parasympathetic stimulation, which leads to the contraction of the detrusor muscle and sympathetic stimulation, which leads to relaxation and facilitates expansion. It comes from the inferior aortic, hypogastric, and pelvic (bladder) plexus [ 18 ]. Bladder blood supplies come from the internal iliac vessels as the superior and inferior vesical arteries. The first is a branch from the obliterated umbilical artery. The inferior vesical artery is usually a branch from the uterine or vaginal arteries which also arise from the internal iliac vessels [ 14 ].

Methods

A literature review was conducted following the “preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses” (PRISMA) checklist [ 19 ] to identify articles using the PubMed, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases with the terms “robotic surgery” OR “robotic” AND “bladder endometriosis”, with no language or date restrictions. Additionally, a search for gray literature was conducted in the OpenGrey database ( http://www.opengrey.eu/search , accessed on 19 March 2023), Google Scholar (accessed on 19 March 2023), and WorldCat (accessed on 19 March 2023). The inclusion criteria were: (1) full-text articles, (2) case reports or case series, and (3) interventional studies that analyzed the technique, postoperative follow-up, and surgical complications of robotic bladder endometriosis resection. Cases with ureteral involvement were not included. Reviews and duplicate studies were also excluded. The search was independently performed by two authors who extracted pertinent data from eligible articles, which included information such as author, year of publication, research objective, study design, sample size, assessment and analytical methods, and results. In cases of disagreement, the data were evaluated by a third author. A total of 49 articles (PubMed) were initially identified. After the duplicates were removed, the titles and abstracts checked, and the full text reviewed, 25 studies met the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of the initial 25 articles, 11 were excluded as they did not report bladder endometriosis, robotic surgery, or mention any follow-up information. As a result, 12 articles were included for further analysis. A secondary search was conducted in the bibliographical references of the selected articles to identify other sources not detected through the initial search. Three articles were added, making a total of fifteen. In the Web of Science database, a total of 80 articles were initially identified. After removing duplicates, reviewing titles and abstracts, and conducting a full-text review, 19 studies were found to meet the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria or were duplicated with the PubMed search. Of these, 18 were excluded, as they did not report bladder endometriosis, robotic surgery, or provide any follow-up information. Consequently, only 1 article met the criteria and was retained for further analysis ( Figure 1 ).

Results

Endometriosis surgery must balance preserving function and fertility while achieving complete excision and preventing complications during and after surgery. A complex decision such as this one demands surgical judgment grounded in knowledge of the anatomy and pathology of endometriosis [ 20 ]. Minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic and robotic surgeries are preferred over laparotomy. Not many studies compared conventional laparoscopy (CL) with robotic surgery in the treatment of endometriosis. Saget et al., assessing perioperative results of robotic surgery (RS) in the context of DE, observed no increases in blood loss or in peri- or postoperative complications [ 21 ]. Sotto et al., in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 73 women, observed no differences in operative time, blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, perioperative complications, and quality of life [ 22 ]. Nezhat and Sirota, in a retrospective study, observed after body mass index stratification that obese patients had significantly longer surgical time in RS compared to CL: 282.5 min [range, 224–342 min] for RS versus 174 min [range, 130–270 min] for conventional laparoscopy ( p < 0.05) [ 23 ]. Studies of RS and bladder endometriosis are presented in the literature, mostly in the form of case reports. We found twelve case reports—one of them is a video article ( Table 1 ) and three are retrospective studies ( Table 2 ). All case reports showed that surgical management was feasible and had good results using robotic surgery [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Retrospective studies evaluated heterogeneous outcomes but, in general, concluded that RS was feasible and safe. When comparing blood loss, surgical time, conversion to laparotomy, and incidence of complications, there were no differences between RS and CL [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Case Reports. Retrospective Studies. Therefore, the studies demonstrate the feasibility of robotic surgery for deep endometriosis involving the bladder and have shown comparable results with conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. The additional costs account for not only the expense of the equipment itself but also its maintenance, the requirement for specially trained workers, and the lengthier time spent in the operating room. However, if robotic technology leads to a higher proportion of cases being performed by minimally invasive techniques, with the potential results of decreased postoperative morbidity and fewer recovery days off work, then this cost may be outweighed by the benefit to the general public [ 40 ]. The preparation of the patient with bladder endometriosis for robotic surgery should follow the same principles as for the surgical treatment of DE in other sites. The patient should be positioned with open legs to facilitate access to the perineum. Trendelenburg should be used only to the point that the small intestines do not fall into the pelvis. We usually start with maximum cephalodeclive and pull the small bowel out of the pelvis. In the sequence, we ask an assistant to decrease the Trendelenburg level until we find the best position, with the least cephalodeclive as possible. The next step is to decide where to make the port placements. Another important change in our practice, especially after we started using the Xi DaVinci platform (Intuitive Surgical ® , Sunnyvale, CA, USA), is to almost never use the fourth robotic arm ( Figure 2 ). By making one fewer incision, we can reduce the cost, improve aesthetics, and maybe reduce the frequency of port complications, such as hernias. The camera arm is always inserted through the belly button in all cases of endometriosis, including BE. The instruments used for the robotic procedure are monopolar scissors, the fenestrated bipolar, and a needle-holder. For cost reduction, we avoid using two needle holders for suturing and we use, instead, the bipolar itself as a suture assistant (plus one needle holder). Once the camera is docked, we inspect the abdominal and pelvic cavities. With a good preoperative image assessment, usually we have a good correlation with the surgical findings, and we can follow the presurgical plan. However, it is useful to perform a cystoscopic evaluation for the exchange of information between the urologist and the gynecological surgeon when working with a multidisciplinary team. The systematic approach for the resection of bladder endometriosis, as well as for most endometriotic lesions, should be performed from the healthy tissue to the diseased area. After the identification of the BE, we start developing the paravesical space on the right side with an opening of the anterior aspect of the broad ligament ( Figure 3 ). We always try to identify the umbilical ligament ( Figure 4 ) before dissecting caudally in the direction of the pelvic floor. The association between BE and endometriosis (with retraction) of the round ligament is high ( Figure 5 ) [ 41 ]. If it is affected, we remove the area of the round ligament infiltrated by the disease ( Figure 6 ). The same steps are performed on the left side. When feasible, we try to identify the normal vesicovaginal space caudal to the endometriotic lesion, making a retrograde (caudal–cranial) dissection of this space. We routinely use a uterine manipulator with a vaginal delineator, as it is very helpful to identify the vaginal wall, making the dissection of the vesicovaginal space much easier. These dissections are made on both paravesical spaces (right and left), with the objective of “centralizing” the disease ( Figure 7 ), a concept already described by our group for the resection of endometriosis of the posterior compartment [ 42 ]. It is important to note that “paravesical space” does not exist in the anatomical nomenclature, which may lead to discrepancies among surgeons. However, some authors consider the lateral area to the umbilical arteries as the paravesical space (paravesical fossae), and the more medial part as the true retropubic space [ 43 ]. After both paravesical spaces have been dissected and the lesion centralized, we begin the dissection of the vesicouterine space, with the aim of mobilizing the lesion from the uterus and vagina and leaving it only stuck to the bladder. This dissection can be obtained with small cuts with monopolar scissors in high-power pure cut mode (level 5/6 in the Xi console) in the cranial–caudal direction. During this step, we can fill the bladder with 100 to 150 mL of saline to better delineate the bladder dome and facilitate the dissection of the vesicovaginal space ( Figure 8 ). With the endometriotic lesion already mobilized, we make a shallow incision with monopolar scissors around the nodule to delimitate the area to be removed. Whenever possible, we try to shave the nodule, avoiding opening the bladder mucosa, mostly when intraoperative cystoscopy is negative for mucosal infiltration ( Figure 9 ). When the mucosa is affected, we open the bladder and finalize the nodule resection, evaluate the mucosa ( Figure 10 ), and always check the ureteral ostia. Except for lesions infiltrating the trigone, we do not routinely insert a double “J” catheter in the surgical treatment of BE. We close the bladder in two planes. For the mucosa, we use polyglycolide 4.0 in a running fashion and for the muscle layer, we use 4.0 polyglactin (or polydioxanone 4.0), also in a running fashion ( Figure 11 ).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbladder_endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (46)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-08T06:18:23.926119+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T06:16:50.221018+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK