An Abundance of Studies But Dearth of Evidence regarding Endometriosis and Adenomyosis

Jason A Abbott, Jason Abbott, Kho R, Rosanne Kho, Rosanne M. Kho
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2019 · vol. 27(2) , pp. 241–243 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.003 · PMID:31812611 · W2993660376
Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-13 ⓘ

This review analyzes the extensive literature on endometriosis and adenomyosis, highlighting a significant gap between the volume of studies and the robust evidence required for clinical decision-making.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (16)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:09:50.462052+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:26:07.973840+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK