Circulating cell-free endometrial DNA level is unaltered during menstruation and in endometriosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is circulating cell-free DNA (cirDNA) from the endometrium elevated during menstruation and in endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometrial cirDNA does not increase during menstruation and is not elevated in endometriosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Changes in cirDNA associated with common benign conditions are a potential source of false positives in cancer diagnostic applications, but also present an opportunity for biomarker development for diseases such as endometriosis. Elevated cirDNA has been reported in endometriosis patients compared to healthy community controls, but no difference in total or endometrial cirDNA has been found between patients with endometriosis and patients with other gynaecological conditions. Likewise, menstruation is a potential driver of changes in cirDNA levels and tissue profile, but total and endothelial cirDNA do not increase during menstruation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: For endometriosis comparisons, 59 participants with surgically confirmed endometriosis and 27 laparoscopic patients without endometriosis (hospital controls) were prospectively recruited, while 25 healthy community participants (healthy controls) were recruited in a university setting. Total and endometrial cirDNA and cirDNA fragmentation were measured across the three groups. For menstrual comparisons, 36 matched non-menstruating and menstruating samples were collected from healthy women recruited within a university setting, and the endometrial cirDNA was compared between the two groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: cirDNA was extracted from venous blood plasma then quantitated by quantitative PCR of ALU repetitive element (115 bp) and TP53 gene sequence (105 bp) for total concentration. cirDNA derived from the endometrium was quantitated by methylation-specific droplet digital PCR of a FAM101A region (69 bp) after bisulfite conversion of the DNA. A cirDNA size fragmentation ratio was obtained by quantifying a long segment of ALU repetitive element (247 bp) and expressing the amount relative to the 115 bp ALU target. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No differences in cirDNA level were found in any comparison populations in this study. Mean total cirDNA was unchanged between healthy controls (ALU-115-3.31 ng/ml; TP53-2.73 ng/ml), hospital controls (ALU-115-3.47 ng/ml; TP53-2.83 ng/ml) and endometriosis patients (ALU-115-3.35 ng/ml; TP53-2.66 ng/ml). Likewise, endometrial cirDNA was unchanged between healthy controls (18.3 copies/ml), hospital controls (20.6 copies/ml) and endometriosis patients (22 copies/ml). Endometrial cirDNA did not change during menstruation (non-menstruating: 38 copies/ml; menstruating: 33 copies/ml). Irrespective of endometriosis diagnosis, blood from patients undergoing laparoscopy (hospital controls: 0.77; endometriosis patients: 0.79), had a significantly higher cirDNA size ratio than community-recruited healthy controls (0.64), indicating increased abundance of long cirDNA fragments. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: It was not possible to completely match the age, BMI and parity between the three cohorts investigated, however of these, only age has been shown to influence circulating DNA levels and not within the age range of our cohort. Blood from community-recruited healthy women and women undergoing laparoscopy was collected via antecubital vein venepuncture (processed within 3 h) and with either peripheral cannula or venepuncture (processed within 6 h), respectively, which could potentially impact the size distribution of circulating DNA fragments. For the collection of non-menstruating phase blood samples, we did not differentiate between follicular phase, ovulation and luteal phase. Thus, only the mensturating samples were collected at a consistent phase, and any fluctuations in cirDNA that occur at the other phases may have obscured small changes during menstruation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: There is no evidence that cirDNA has potential as a diagnostic biomarker for endometriosis. Endometriosis, representing a common benign gynaecological condition, and menstruation, representing a normal physiological occurrence in women, should not affect methylation-based diagnostics in other disease areas, including oncology. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): N.L.Y.: Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend through The University of New South Wales, Translational Cancer Research Network PhD Scholarship Top-Up Award via the Cancer Institute NSW, Beth Yarrow Memorial Award in Medical Science, UNSW Completion Scholarship; C.E.H.: Gynaecological Oncology Fund of the Royal Hospital for Women; K.W.: Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation and CAMILLA AND MARC. C.E.F.: UNSW Women's Wellbeing Academy and the Australian Human Rights Institute. We declare the following competing interest: K.W. holds stock in Guardant Health, Exact Sciences and Epigenomics AG. No other authors have competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (35)
- An Abundance of Studies But Dearth of Evidence regarding Endometriosis and Adenomyosis via openalex
- An evidence‐based approach to assessing surgical versus clinical diagnosis of symptomatic endometriosis via openalex
- Association between ovarian cancer and advanced endometriosis via openalex
- Atypical Sites of Deeply Infiltrative Endometriosis: Clinical Characteristics and Imaging Findings via openalex
- Comparison of total and endometrial circulating cell-free DNA in women with and without endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: an Australian survey via openalex
- Non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis: the goal or own goal? via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: a data linkage cohort study via openalex
- Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis via openalex
- W2800646946 via openalex
- W2899349047 via openalex
- W2906134081 via openalex
- W2945272123 via openalex
- W2955810777 via openalex
- W2980526132 via openalex
- W3013924915 via openalex
- W3037694124 via openalex
- W3087700560 via openalex
- W3108681091 via openalex
- W3118292709 via openalex
- W3118321568 via openalex
- W3159105699 via openalex
- W3174187171 via openalex
- W3211904042 via openalex
- W6749376469 via openalex
- W1994474089 via openalex
- W2068961523 via openalex
- W2071999223 via openalex
- W2083701448 via openalex
- W2087165873 via openalex
- W2134232003 via openalex
- W2137177914 via openalex
- W2298824325 via openalex
- W2743456344 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-25T00:34:34.996496+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK