Features of reproductive potential in patients with extensive endometriosis forms

In: Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction · 2026 · vol. 20(1) , pp. 91–101 · doi:10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2026.676 · W7135404278
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study analyzed anti-Müllerian hormone levels and pregnancy rates in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis, finding age to be a key factor in reproductive potential.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This prospective cohort clinical trial studied 69 patients who underwent surgical treatment for extensive deep infiltrating endometriosis followed by 3 months of anti-relapse gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy, evaluating reproductive potential by measuring anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) before surgery and 6 months afterward and tracking spontaneous pregnancy within 1 year. AMH declined in 51.8% of patients on average by 0.152 ng/mL, with the smallest reduction in women aged 28.5 to 33.5 years regardless of how extensive the surgery was; 10 of 43 women who planned pregnancy achieved spontaneous pregnancy (mean age 36.0 years). The paper’s limitation is that it focuses on AMH change and spontaneous pregnancy timing after a specific surgical plus short-term medical regimen, without reporting a control comparison group. Relevance to endometriosis: the study is centrally about extensive deep infiltrating endometriosis and uses AMH and pregnancy outcomes to characterize reproductive potential after surgical management.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Aim: to determine the optimal tactics for managing patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Materials and Methods . A prospective cohort clinical trial was conducted with 69 patients examined following surgical treatment for extensive infiltrating endometriosis and 3-month-long anti-relapse therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Reproductive potential was assessed based on quantitating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) before and 6 months post-surgery, recording cases with/without onset of spontaneous pregnancy within 1 year. Results. While comparatively analyzing AMH level in preand postoperative period revealed its decline in 51.8 % by average 0.152 ng/ml; the smallest reduction was found in women aged 28.5 to 33.5 years, regardless of the extent of surgical treatment. Pregnancy occurred in 10 of 43 planning women (average age 36,0 [32,0–42,5] years): 7 patients underwent ovarian interventions, 3 – surgical treatment for endometriosis of other localizations. Conclusion. The data obtained evidence that subject’s age plays a decisive role in maintaining reproductive potential and a need for a differentiated approach in developing individual tactics for management and treatment of patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis, taking into account age, localization of endometriosis and reproductive plans.
Full text 12,029 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim: to determine the optimal tactics for managing patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Materials

and Methods. A prospective cohort clinical trial was conducted with 69 patients examined following surgical treatment for extensive infiltrating endometriosis and 3-month-long anti-relapse therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Reproductive potential was assessed based on quantitating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) before and 6 months post-surgery, recording cases with/without onset of spontaneous pregnancy within 1 year. Results. While comparatively analyzing AMH level in preand postoperative period revealed its decline in 51.8 % by average 0.152 ng/ml; the smallest reduction was found in women aged 28.5 to 33.5 years, regardless of the extent of surgical treatment. Pregnancy occurred in 10 of 43 planning women (average age 36,0 [32,0–42,5] years): 7 patients underwent ovarian interventions, 3 – surgical treatment for endometriosis of other localizations. Conclusion. The data obtained evidence that subject’s age plays a decisive role in maintaining reproductive potential and a need for a differentiated approach in developing individual tactics for management and treatment of patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis, taking into account age, localization of endometriosis and reproductive plans.

Keywords

About the Authors D. M. KalimatovaRussian Federation Donna M. Kalimatova - MD, PhD. 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow 117513 Yu. E. Dobrokhotova Russian Federation Yulia E. Dobrokhotova - MD, Dr Med Sci, Prof. 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow 117513 M. D. Kazieva Russian Federation Milana D. Kazieva - MD. 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow 117513 I. Yu. Ilyina Russian Federation Irina Yu. Ilyina - MD, Dr Med Sci, Prof. 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow 117513 J. M. Ibragimova Russian Federation Jamilya M. Ibragimova - MD, PhD. 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow 117513

References

1. Politova A.K., Kira E.F., Vershinina Yu.A., Aleksandrova A.D. Surgical treatment of deep retrocervical endometriosis. [Khirurgicheskoe lechenie glubokogo retrotservikalnogo endometrioza]. Vestnik nacional'nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2021;16(1):177–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2021_16_2_149. 2. Alieva P.M., Dumanovskaya M.R., Solopova A.E. et al. The features of the course of retrocervical endometriosis. [Osobennosti techeniya retrotservikalnogo endometrioza]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2024;(2):157–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.222. 3. Almova I.K., Khilkevich E.G., Chuprynin V.D. et al. Comparative analysis of techniques for diagnosing retrocervical endometriosis. [Sravnitelnyy analiz metodov diagnostiki retrotservikalnogo endometrioza]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2019;(10):129–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.10.129-139. 4. Adamyan L.V., Andreeva E.N., Apolikhina I.A. et al. Endometriosis: diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation. Federal clinical guidelines for patient management. [Endometrioz: diagnostika, lechenie i reabilitaciya. Federal'nye klinicheskie rekomendacii po vedeniyu bol'nyh]. Мoscow, 2013. 65 p. (In Russ.). 5. Ponomareva T.A., Altukhova O.B., Ponomarenko I.V., Churnosov M.I. The role of genetic factors in developing endometrioid lesions. [Rol' geneticheskih faktorov v formirovanii endometrioidnyh porazhenij]. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023;17(4):443–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.434. 6. Carfagna P., De Cicco Nardone C., De Cicco Nardone A. et al. Role of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of ureteral involvement in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(4):550–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17524. 7. Rusina E.I., Yarmolinskaya M.I., Piankova E.O. Deep infiltrative endometriosis. Contentious issues: pros and cons. [Glubokij infil'trativnyj endometrioz. Spornye voprosy: za i protiv]. Ginekologiya. 2020;22(5):50–6. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2020.5.200274. 8. Bezhenar V.F., Kruglov S.Yu., Kuzmina N.S. et al. Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing sirgery for retrocervical endometriosis. [Funktsionalnye rezultaty nervsberegayushchikh operatsiy pri retrotservikalnom endometrioze]. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2022;5(2):80–1. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-3-62-68. 9. Trishkin A.G., Zotova O.A., Yushchenko M.A. Reproductive outcomes of infiltrative endometriosis after surgical treatment with assisted reproductive technologies (a clinical case). [Reproduktivnye iskhody infiltrativnogo endometrioza posle khirurgicheskogo lecheniya s primeneniem vspomogatelnykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologiy (klinicheskiy sluchay)]. Opuholi zhenskoj reproduktivnoj sistemy. 2024;20(1):139–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2024-20-1-139-142. 10. Abesadze E., Chiantera V., Sehouli J., Mechsner S. Post-operative management and follow-up of surgical treatment in the case of rectovaginal and retrocervical endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302(4):957–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05686-0. 11. Ovsyannikova M.R., Popov A.A., Chantieva T.M., Shidlovskaya N.V. Fatal complications during pregnancy and delivery in women with profound endometriosis infiltrates: what is new in general clinical practice. [Fatalnye oslozhneniya v period beremennosti i rodov u zhenshchin s glubokim infiltrativnym endometriozom: chto novogo v obshcheklinicheskoy praktike]. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2023;23(4):9–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2023230419. 12. Zilberman A., Eisenberg V., Yoeli R. et al. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm in a pregnant patient with retrocervical endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):1209–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.010. 13. Filip L., Duicа F., Prаdatu A. et al. Endometriosis associated infertility: a critical review and analysis on etiopathogenesis and therapeutic approaches. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(9):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090460. 14. Raja M.H.R., Farooqui N., Zuberi N. et al. Endometriosis, infertility and microRNA's: a review. J. Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(9):102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102157. 15. Spencer S., Lazaridis A., Grammatis A, Hirsch M. The treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;34(5):300–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000806. 16. Prescott J., Farland L.V., Tobias D.K. et al. A prospective cohort study of endometriosis and subsequent risk of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1475–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew085. 17. Kimber-Trojnar Ż., Pilszyk A., Niebrzydowska M. et al. The potential of non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of asymptomatic patients with endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2762. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132762. 18. Orazov M.R., Radzinskiy V.E., Khamoshina M.B. et al. Endometriosisassociated infertility: options of combined therapy. [Besplodie, associirovannoe s endometriozom yaichnikov: vozmozhnosti kombinirovannoj terapii]. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2020;19(2):27–34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2020-2-27-34. 19. Gokhberg Ya.A., Timofeeva A.V., Kalinina E.A. Molecular markers for endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology programs. [Molekulyarnye markery receptivnosti endometriya v programmah vspomogatel'nyh reproduktivnyh tekhnologij]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2021;(11):56–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.11.56-62. 20. Baigalmaa B., Bitsadze V.O., Solopova A.G. et al. External genital endometriosis post-surgery hemostasis parameters. [Pokazateli gemostaza posle hirurgicheskogo lecheniya naruzhnogo genital'nogo endometrioza]. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2024;18(5):648–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.575. 21. Molotkov A.S., Yarmolinskaya M.I. A role of anti-Mullerian hormone in external genital endometriosis. [Znachenie antimyullerova gormona pri naruzhnom genital'nom endometrioze]. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2021;15(2):182–8. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2021.164. 22. Shebl O., Ebner T., Sommergruber M. et al. Anti-muellerian hormone serum levels in women with endometriosis: a case-control study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25(11):713–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590903159615. 23. Goodman L.R., Goldberg J.M., Flyckt R.L. et al. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):589.e1–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.029. 24. Mostaejeran F., Hamoush Z., Rouholamin S. Evaluation of antimullerian hormone levels before and after laparoscopic management of endometriosis. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:182. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.164006. 25. Kitajima M., Matsumoto K., Murakami N. et al. AMH concentrations in peritoneal fluids of women with and without endometriosis. Front Surg. 2020;7:600202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.600202. 26. Safronova A.S., Buralkina N.A., Chuprynin V.D., Ivanets T.Yu. Hormonal profile of patients with deep infiltrative endometriosis. [Gormonal'nyj profil' pacientok s glubokim infil'trativnym endometriozom]. Medicinskij sovet. 2021;(3):39–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-3-39-43. 27. Tishchenko E.N., Artymuk N.V., Zotova O.A., Danilova L.N. Maternal and newborn outcomes in patients with endometriosis-associated infertility. [Iskhody beremennostej i rodov u pacientok s endometriozassociirovannym besplodiem]. Fundamental'naya i klinicheskaya medicina. 2024;9(3):66–73. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23946/25000764-2024-9-3-66-73. 28. Fedorov A.A., Popov A.A., Krasnopol’skaya K.V. et al. Effect of surgical treatment on fertility in patients with endometrioid cysts. [ [Vliyanie hirurgicheskogo lecheniya na fertil'nost' u pacientok s endometrioidnymi kistami]. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2022;22(5):56–61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20222205156. What is already known about this subject? ► Endometriosis of various locations causes infertility in 40 % of patients. The effectiveness of isolated drug therapy remains low. ► The degree of invasion of endometriosis foci is a determining factor in choosing an extent of surgical treatment. ► Radical surgical treatment of endometriosis in combination with drug therapy and assisted reproductive technologies increases the chances of pregnancy and its successful outcome. What are the new findings? ► An inverse relationship between patients’ age and anti-Müllerian hormone level has been established. ► Higher frequency of implemented patient reproductive plans was demonstrated while performing ovarian interventions due to ovarian endometriosis. ► The discriminatory ability of patient’s age in predicting ovarian endometriosis has been revealed. How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future? ► The study results may contribute to increasing clinical treatment effectiveness for patients with endometriosis. ► An opportunity for predicting probability of age-related reproductive function in patients with endometriosis and the presence of ovarian endometriosis lesions is presented. ► Conducting comprehensive treatment of endometriosis (surgical and medical) will improve effectiveness of infertility treatment in this group of patients. Review For citations: Kalimatova D.M., Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Kazieva M.D., Ilyina I.Yu., Ibragimova J.M. Features of reproductive potential in patients with extensive endometriosis forms. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2026;20(1):91-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2026.676 JATS XML This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-13T20:58:58.657787+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK