To suppress or not to suppress? If that is the question, has it been answered?
This paper critically examines the existing evidence regarding the suppression of specific biological phenomena to determine if current research has definitively answered the question of whether suppression is necessary or beneficial.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (6)
- Endometriosis and assisted reproductive technologies: maximizing outcomes via openalex
- GnRH agonist administration prior to embryo transfer in freeze-all cycles of patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression via openalex
- Long-term pituitary down-regulation before in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with endometriosis via openalex
- Medical or surgical treatment before embryo transfer improves outcomes in women with abnormal endometrial BCL6 expression via openalex
- Ultralong administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists before in vitro fertilization improves fertilization rate but not clinical pregnancy rate in women with mild endometriosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial via openalex
- W6640900880 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:26:49.206298+00:00