Assessing the knowledge of endometriosis diagnostic tools in a large, international lay population: an online survey

Mathew Leonardi, Rodrigo Rocha, A N Tun-Ismail, A.N. Tun‐ismail, Tun-Ismail AN, Kristy Robledo, K P Robledo, Mike Armour, G. Condous, Condous G
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2021 · vol. 128(13) , pp. 2084–2090 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16865 · PMID:34403184 · W3155325004
Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-14 ⓘ

An international online survey of 5301 respondents found limited awareness of non-surgical diagnostic tools for endometriosis, particularly ultrasound, among the general population.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the general population's knowledge regarding the utility and availability of tools to diagnosis endometriosis, with a focus on ultrasound. DESIGN: An international cross-sectional online survey study was performed between August and October 2019. SETTING AND POPULATION: 5301 respondents, representing 73 countries. METHODS: In all, 23 questions survey focused on knowledge of endometriosis diagnosis distributed globally via patient- and community-endometriosis groups using social media. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Descriptive data of the knowledge of diagnostic tools for diagnosing endometriosis, including details about diagnosis using ultrasound. RESULTS: In all, 84.0% of respondents had been previously diagnosed with endometriosis, 71.5% of whom had been diagnosed at the time of surgery. Ultrasound and MRI were the methods of diagnosis in 6.5% and 1.8%, respectively. A total of 91.8%, 28.8% and 16.6% of respondents believed surgery, ultrasound and MRI could diagnose endometriosis, respectively (more than one answer allowed). In those diagnosed by surgery, 21.7% knew about ultrasound as a diagnosis method, whereas in those diagnosed non-surgically, 51.5% knew (P < 0.001). In all, 14.7%, 31.1% and 18.2% stated superficial, ovarian and deep endometriosis could be diagnosed with ultrasound (32.9% stated they did not know which phenotypes of endometriosis could be diagnosed). Lastly, 58.4% of respondents do not believe they could access an advanced ultrasound in their region. CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited appreciation for the role of non-surgical diagnostic tests for endometriosis among lay respondents to this survey. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: International survey shows limited awareness of lay respondents about non-surgical endometriosis diagnostic tools.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pelvic Pain Ultrasonography Adult Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Middle Aged Middle Aged

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (29)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-10T06:11:15.153948+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:32:03.440833+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-10T06:25:47.132674+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK