High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) along may not be a good choice for treatment of adenomyosis
Other
OA: diamond
CC0
AI-generated summary
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) alone may not be an effective treatment option for adenomyosis based on a review of existing literature.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (6)
- Both adjuvant and maintenance therapies are needed in women with symptomatic adenomyosis after uterus-sparing treatment via openalex
- Comparison of the treatment efficacies of HIFU, HIFU combined with GnRH-a, and HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- Letter to the editor: Adjuvant or maintenance therapy may be needed in adenomyosis patients after uterus-sparing surgery via openalex
- Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis via openalex
- The effect of exercise on high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment efficacy in uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a retrospective study via openalex
- W3101128243 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-14T06:08:39.101224+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-14T06:07:52.445481+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK