High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) along may not be a good choice for treatment of adenomyosis
letter
OA: diamond
CC0
AI-generated summary
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) alone may not be an effective treatment option for adenomyosis based on a review of existing literature.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (6)
- Both adjuvant and maintenance therapies are needed in women with symptomatic adenomyosis after uterus-sparing treatment via openalex
- Comparison of the treatment efficacies of HIFU, HIFU combined with GnRH-a, and HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- Letter to the editor: Adjuvant or maintenance therapy may be needed in adenomyosis patients after uterus-sparing surgery via openalex
- Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis via openalex
- The effect of exercise on high‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment efficacy in uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a retrospective study via openalex
- W3101128243 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-13T06:11:40.775766+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-09-13T06:10:21.815001+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK