Abstract
Introduction: Polypoid endometriosis is a rare
form of endometriosis, distinct from classical or usual
endometriosis. Unlike usual endometriosis which usually
presents in young women, polypoid endometriosis occurs
more commonly in postmenopausal women. It mimics
malignancy and simulates ovarian cancer, not only on
preoperative investigations but also intraoperatively,
causing a diagnostic dilemma.
Case Report: We describe here, a case of polypoid
endometriosis that was presumed to be a case of ovarian
cancer with peritoneal dissemination preoperatively.
Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan
revealed bilateral solid-cystic adnexal lesions, moderate
ascites, and peritoneal thickening. Serum CA-125 was
1057 U/mL and serum HE4 was 88 pmol/L. Due to high
index of suspicion of malignancy, the patient was taken
Neha Kumar 1, MBBS, MS, MCh, Nidhi Nayyar 2, MBBS,
DNB, Deepasha Garg 3, MBBS, MD, Rajan Duggal 4,
MBBS, MD, DNB, Narottam Khadaria 5, MBBS, MD
Affiliations: 1Gynecologic Oncology, Senior Consultant, Gy -
necologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK
Cancer Centre, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi,
India; 2Obstetrics & Gynecology, MNAMS, Fellowship in
Gynecologic Oncology, Associate Consultant, Gynecologic
Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Cancer
Centre, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India;
3Pathology, Consultant, Histopathology & Cytopathology,
BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India; 4Pathology,
Associate Director & HOD, Histopathology & Cytopathology,
BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India; 5Senior
Consultant, Radiology, Department of Radiology, BLK-Max
Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Neha Kumar, Senior Consultant,
Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology,
BLK Cancer Centre, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital,
Delhi, India; Email:
[email protected]
Received: 06 January 2022
Accepted: 26 March 2022
Published: 27 April 2022
for exploratory laparotomy and underwent hysterectomy
with bilateral adnexectomy with excision of deposits
over pouch of Douglas and both ureters and excision
of adherent thickened omentum. Intraoperative frozen
section as well as the final histopathology was reported as
polypoid endometriosis.
Conclusion
It is imperative for the gynecologist,
oncologist, and pathologist to know of this rare benign
entity and distinguish it from ovarian malignancy, in
order to avoid radical surgery and overtreatment. Surgery
with complete removal of all lesions is the cornerstone of
management of polypoid endometriosis and the patients
generally have a good prognosis.
Keywords
Cancer mimic, Endometriosis, Ovarian can-
cer, Polypoid endometriosis
How to cite this article
Kumar N, Nayyar N, Garg D, Duggal R, Khadaria
N. Polypoid endometriosis: A rare variant and a
mimic of ovarian malignancy. Int J Case Rep Images
2022;13:101302Z01NK2022.
Article ID: 101302Z01NK2022
*********
doi: 10.5348/101302Z01NK2022CR
Introduction
Polypoid endometriosis is an uncommon variant of
endometriosis, more commonly found in postmenopausal
women, which mimics an ovarian malignancy both
preoperatively and intraoperatively. It has histological
features akin to an endometrial polyp and most
commonly affects the ovaries, colon, mesentery, uterine
serosa, cervical canal, vaginal mucosa, fallopian tubes,
ureters, bladder peritoneum, and paraurethral and
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 13, 2022. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2022;13:101302Z01NK2022.
www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Kumar et al. 2
paravaginal regions [1]. Here, we report a case of ovarian
polypoid endometriosis that resembled ovarian cancer on
preoperative clinical features and radiological imaging as
well as on the intraoperative gross findings. Intraoperative
frozen section and the final histopathology confirmed
this rare benign entity.
CASE REPORT
A 36-year-old woman with previous two normal
deliveries presented with complaints of abdominal
distension and bloating sensation for seven days. She
had past history of an endometriotic cyst 10 years back,
for which she received GnRH analogs for 3 months
followed by laparoscopic left ovarian cystectomy. She was
asymptomatic thereafter and was not on any follow-up or
hormonal therapy for the same.
The ultrasound done at the time of presentation of
current complaints revealed a 10×6×5 cm solid cystic
lesion in left adnexa with few calcific foci within it and
moderate ascites. The serum CA-125 and HE 4 values
were elevated 1057 U/mL and 88 pmol/L, respectively.
Rest of the tumor markers namely, carcinoembryonic
antigen (CEA), CA-19.9, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Beta
human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) were within normal limits. Contrast
enhanced CT scan of whole abdomen showed solid
cystic mass lesions in bilateral adnexa (left 11.3×7.1×8.8
cm; right 5.0×3.4×5.8 cm) extending into pouch of
Douglas, bilateral tiny anterior sub-diaphragmatic lymph
nodes, moderate free fluid in abdomen, and peritoneal
thickening (Figure 1A and B).
In view of high index of suspicion for malignancy,
the patient was taken up for exploratory laparotomy.
Intraoperative findings showed a 10×7 cm polypoidal,
exophytic left adnexal mass adherent to left ureter, bulky
right ovary with few cysts on ovarian surface, deposits
present over uterus, both ureters, ovarian fossae,
appendix and pouch of Douglas, thickened omentum
and around 750 mL of serosanguinous ascitic fluid. Left
adnexal mass was excised and sent for frozen section
which was reported as polypoidal endometriosis (Figure
2A).
Type I hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy with
adhesiolysis, excision of deposits over pouch of Douglas
and both distal ureters, excision of adherent thickened
omentum, appendectomy, and bilateral DJ stenting
was done. Final histopathological report was suggestive
of polypoidal endometriosis presenting as left adnexal
mass and causing extensive hemorrhagic deposits in
pouch of Douglas, left parametrium and right and left
ureters with endometriosis of right adnexa (Figure 2B).
Immunohistochemistry was positive for estrogen receptor
(ER) and CD10, ER highlighting the benign endometrial
glands and CD10 the surrounding endometrial stroma.
The postoperative period was uneventful and bilateral
DJ-stents were removed after six weeks. The patient
received two doses of injection Leuprolide Depot 11.25
mg, and has had follow-up visits till 18 months post-
surgery. She has been disease-free and symptom-free till
present.
Figure 1: Contrast-enhanced CT scan (A: axial section, B:
coronal section) showing left adnexal mass, bulky right adnexa,
ascites, and peritoneal thickening.
Figure 2: (A) Photo panel shows hemorrhagic polypoidal
tissue fragment in gross morphology. (B) Microscopy shows
polyp composed of few cystically dilated endometrial glands
with intervening fibrocellular stroma. There is no evidence
of dysplasia or invasive malignancy. Hematoxylin & Eosin,
original magnification × 20.
Discussion
Polypoid endometriosis is a rare variant of
endometriosis presenting as polypoidal mass(es) which
may be misinterpreted as a neoplasm, preoperatively on
clinical examination and imaging, intraoperatively on
gross examination, and postoperatively on pathological
assessment. It occurs over a wide age range (23–78 years)
but more commonly in the postmenopausal women (mean
age 52.5 years), unlike usual or classical endometriosis
which is commoner in younger women [1]. The usual
symptoms are abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and
urinary symptoms like frequency, hematuria, and
urgency. The clinical presentations include pelvic
mass, vaginal polypoid mass, large bowel obstruction,
or an incidental finding in hysterectomy with bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy specimen. The most common
sites of involvement are large bowel and its mesentery,
ovary, uterine serosa, vaginal and cervical mucosa,
ureter, fallopian tube, omentum, bladder, paraurtehral
and paravaginal regions, and the retroperitoneum [1].
The term “polypoid endometriosis” was coined
by Mostofizadeh and Scully for a distinct type of
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 13, 2022. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2022;13:101302Z01NK2022.
www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Kumar et al. 3
endometriosis with histopathological features simulating
an endometrial polyp [2]. Nearly half the cases occur
in a milieu of exogenous hormone intake, including
hormone replacement therapy (unopposed estrogen
or mixed estrogen-progestin), tamoxifen (which acts
as an estrogen agonist on endometrium) or after the
withdrawal of GnRH analogs (used in the treatment of
usual endometriosis) [1, 3–5].
The imaging of choice is an magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) where the lesion appears as a T2
hyperintense polypoidal mass with a T2 hypointense
peripheral rim. On contrast enhancement, the pattern
appears similar to that of endometrium and there is lack
of diffusion restriction [6].
In this case, the patient was a young 36-year-old
woman, with prior history of use of GnRh analogs for
three months followed by left ovarian cystectomy for
endometriotic cyst done 10 years back. Although MRI is
the imaging of choice, there was a high index of suspicion
for malignancy in this case, with the ultrasound showing
a large solid cystic adnexal mass and moderate ascites,
and hence a contrast CT scan of the whole abdomen
was ordered. The benign nature of the left adnexal mass
on frozen section report was informed to the patient’s
relatives, but they opted for removal of the bulky right
ovary and uterus instead of only right ovarian cystectomy
followed by close surveillance.
Histopathological presentation of polypoid
endometriosis includes presence of polypoid tumor-like
masses projecting from a serosal or mucosal surface
or the lining epithelium of an endometriotic cyst. On
gross examination, the lesions are fleshy with cystic
changes and hemorrhage. Microscopic examination
shows endometrial glands and stroma with a variety of
architectural patterns in glandular epithelium. The most
common glandular pattern is simple cystic and noncystic
hyperplasia without atypia. Other patterns include
simple or complex hyperplasia with atypia, disordered
proliferation, and cystic atrophy. Epithelial metaplasia
(tubal, mucinous, papillary, and squamous), hemorrhage,
fibrosis, hemosiderin laden histiocytes, and decidual
changes are also present. In some cases, the lesion may
resemble an intrauterine endometrial polyp. Stromal
cell atypia is generally absent and most of the cases
are found in the proliferative phase stroma. The main
differential diagnosis in a case of polypoid endometriosis
is a mullerian adenosarcoma. Unlike adenosarcoma,
polypoid endometriosis lacks periglandular stromal
hypercellularity, stromal papillae, and stromal atypia.
In the largest series of 24 cases of polypoid
endometriosis reported by Parker et al., synchronous or
contiguous usual type endometriosis was found in 75%
of cases and/or previous history of endometriosis in 29%
cases [1]. Polypoid endometriosis is generally associated
with a benign course and surgery with complete removal
of all the lesions is the key to the management of the
disease.
Conclusion
Polypoid endometriosis is a distinct and rare variant
of endometriosis which may simulate a neoplasm on
clinical presentation, imaging, intraoperative findings,
and histopathological evaluation. Unlike classical or
usual endometriosis, it is commoner in postmenopausal
women, although it may occur over a wide age range.
It usually occurs in the milieu of exogenous hormone
intake. Surgery with complete removal of all lesions is
the cornerstone of management of the disease. In spite
of presence of hyperplastic or metaplastic glands and
occasional cytological atypia, the disease follows a benign
course and progression to neoplasm, if any, is rare.
Although it is an uncommon entity, the gynecologists and
pathologists should be aware of this form of endometriosis
since the clinical, radiological as well as the intraoperative
findings resemble that of malignancy, and being a benign
mimic, it can be treated with a conservative surgery
with excision of lesions rather than the radical surgery
(staging/cytoreduction) done for ovarian cancer.
References
1. Parker RL, Dadmanesh F, Young RH, Clement PB.
Polypoid endometriosis: A clinicopathologic analysis
of 24 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg
Pathol 2004;28(3):285–97.
2. Mostoufizadeh M, Scully RE. Malignant tumors
arising in endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol
1980;23(3):951–63.
3. Jaegle WT, Barnett JC, Stralka BR, Chappell NP.
Polypoid endometriosis mimicking invasive cancer in
an obese, postmenopausal tamoxifen user. Gynecol
Oncol Rep 2017;22:105–7.
4. Choi IH, Jin SY, Jeen YM, Lee JJ, Kim DW.
Tamoxifen-associated polypoid endometriosis
mimicking an ovarian neoplasm. Obstet Gynecol Sci
2015;58(4):327–30.
5. Othman NH, Othman MS, Ismail AN, Mohammad
NZ, Ismail Z. Multiple polypoid endometriosis
– A rare complication following withdrawal of
gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist
for severe endometriosis: A case report. Aust N Z J
Obstet Gynaecol 1996;36(2):216–8.
6. Ghafoor S, Lakhman Y, Park KJ, Petkovska I. Polypoid
endometriosis: A mimic of malignancy. Abdom Radiol
(NY) 2020;45(6):1776–82.
*********
Author Contributions
Neha Kumar – Conception of the work, Design of the
work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation
of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically
for important intellectual content, Final approval of the
version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 13, 2022. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2022;13:101302Z01NK2022.
www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Kumar et al. 4
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved
Nidhi Nayyar – Design of the work, Acquisition of
data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting
the work, Revising the work critically for important
intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be
published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy
or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately
investigated and resolved
Deepasha Garg – Acquisition of data, Analysis of data,
Interpretation of data, Revising the work critically for
important intellectual content, Final approval of the
version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved
Rajan Duggal – Acquisition of data, Analysis of data,
Interpretation of data, Revising the work critically for
important intellectual content, Final approval of the
version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved
Narottam Khadaria – Acquisition of data, Analysis of
data, Interpretation of data, Revising the work critically
for important intellectual content, Final approval of the
version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved
Guarantor of Submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of Support
None.
Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient
for publication of this article.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting
Information files.
Copyright
© 2022 Neha Kumar et al. This article is distributed
under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution
License which permits unrestricted use, distribution
and reproduction in any medium provided the original
author(s) and original publisher are properly credited.
Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for
more information.
Access full text article on
other devices
Access PDF of article on
other devices
Submit your manuscripts at
www.edoriumjournals.com
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.