[Endometriosis pain research in Germany : ENDO-PAIN and StEPP-UPP-two new research consortia on endometriosis pain]

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Endometriosis is one of the most common causes of chronic pelvic or lower-abdominal pain, yet mechanisms, predictors, and patient-centered treatment pathways remain insufficiently defined. This article summarizes the situation in Germany and presents two complementary research consortia: StEPP-UPP and ENDO-PAIN.StEPP-UPP addresses the clinical heterogeneity of endometriosis pain via a prospective multicenter cohort, standardized patient-reported outcomes, quantitative sensory testing, and multi-omics from blood, stool, and lesions. Explainable artificial intelligence and machine-learning models aim to estimate risk and trajectories of persistent pain, define mechanism-informed subgroups, and support treatment decisions. Preclinical mouse models with non-evoked behavioral metrics plus multiparametric MRI and single-cell analyses provide mechanistic anchoring for clinical signatures.ENDO-PAIN focuses on neuroinflammation and fibrosis as drivers of pain and chronification. Using patient samples, cell cultures, and 3D organoids, it maps immune-stroma interactions, syndecan signaling, and hormone-inflammation axes (for example P4-TGFβ-NFκB-COX-2) to derive biomarker networks and therapeutic targets.Both consortia integrate patient advocacy structurally to ensure patient-relevant endpoints and accessible information. Together they point to three priorities: standardization of data collection and biobanking; stratification along bio-psycho-social profiles and molecular signatures; and interdisciplinary shared decision-making across research, clinics, and people with endometriosis, aiming for mechanistically grounded, data-driven, patient-centered pain medicine.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-22T06:15:39.293557+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-07-22T06:07:13.250796+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-22T06:09:22.412566+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine