Pregnancy outcomes with donor oocyte embryos in patients diagnosed with adenomyosis using the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment criteria
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study assessed pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis, diagnosed via the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment criteria, who received donor oocyte embryos.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria to evaluate the impact of adenomyosis on the live birth rate after donor egg embryo transfer.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary fertility care center.
PATIENT(S): A total of 100 patients who received 223 donor embryo transfers from January 2014-2020. All patients underwent ultrasound before their first transfer.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our study was powered (80%) to assess the primary outcome of live birth rate; the secondary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates.
RESULT(S): Only 22 of 100 patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis on the original ultrasound report. When the MUSA criteria were applied, 76 patients had at least 1 possible ultrasonographic feature of adenomyosis; all 76 patients had an interrupted junctional zone. The second most common feature of adenomyosis was a globular and/or enlarged uterus (89.4%). Adjusted modeling demonstrated that a single ultrasound feature, 2 or more features, specific features, or the location of features did not affect the live birth outcome. A per-centimeter increase in the diameter of focal lesions was significantly associated with a decrease in the odds of live birth by the factor of 0.91.
CONCLUSION(S): To our knowledge, our study is the first to characterize adenomyosis using the MUSA criteria in the donor oocyte population. Overall, our data were reassuring in that the ultrasonographic features of adenomyosis may not impact reproductive outcomes. However, we identified that the location and size of focal lesions may be important and should be studied further.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (15)
- Adenomyosis does not affect implantation, but is associated with miscarriage in patients undergoing oocyte donation via openalex
- Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015 via openalex
- Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients via openalex
- How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic via openalex
- Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? via openalex
- Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis via openalex
- The association between adenomyosis and recurrent miscarriage via openalex
- The impact of adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a prospective cohort study via openalex
- The impact of adenomyosis on the outcome of IVF–embryo transfer via openalex
- Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18–30‐year‐old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms via openalex
- Uterine adenomyosis and infertility, review of reproductive outcome after in vitro fertilization and surgery via openalex
- Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- W2922267617 via openalex
- W2739504526 via openalex
- W2753073405 via openalex
Cited by (9)
- Adenomyosis and fertility: from pathophysiology to optimizing reproductive outcomes 2026
- Uterine anteroposterior diameter predicts spontaneous pregnancy outcomes in women under 35 years with adenomyosis: a retrospective study 2025
- Focal Adenomyosis and Uterine Junctional Zone Abnormalities: Predictors of Live Birth Rates in Women with Infertility and Adenomyosis Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technologies 2025
- Impact of Localization of Diffuse Adenomyosis on Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes and Perinatal Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study of 585 Patients 2025
- Correlation of adenomyosis features to live birth rates after the first IVF/ICSI treatment, when using the revised Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group definitions 2024
- Adenomyosis Affects Fertility and ART Procedures as Well as Outcomes: An Invited Opinion 2024
- Guideline No. 437: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis 2023
- Sonographic diagnosis of adenomyosis-ultrasound that cried wolf? 2023
- [Directive clinique no 437 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de l'adénomyose] 2023
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-13T17:20:28.795615+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-13T17:19:50.243171+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK