A comparative, randomized study of three different progesterone support of the luteal phase following IVF/ET program

In: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · 1995 · vol. 18(1) , pp. 51–56 · doi:10.1007/bf03349699 · PMID:7759785 · W1967193130
article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-12

This study compared progesterone i.m., hCG, progesterone vaginal cream, and no support in IVF patients, finding all increased luteal progesterone but no significant pregnancy rate differences.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This randomized study compared luteal phase support methods after IVF/ET in 176 women: intramuscular progesterone (50 mg/day), hCG injections (2000 IU every three days), vaginal progesterone cream (100 mg/day), or no supplementation. Serum progesterone and 17-β-estradiol (and the E2/P ratio) were measured across the luteal phase, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed between groups. The authors found no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates among the groups, but all active treatments increased luteal progesterone versus controls, and vaginal cream (and intramuscular progesterone) reduced the E2/P ratio relative to controls; progesterone vaginal cream produced steadier serum progesterone levels than injections. The paper does not explicitly discuss limitations beyond the reported lack of pregnancy-rate differences. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,742 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The use of luteal phase support has been demonstrated in patients undergoing IVF/ET in cycles stimulated after pituitary desensitization with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists. However, it is still not clear which is the most suitable kind of supplementation. This study was designed to compare the absorption and the efficacy of three different luteal support. We randomly administered progesterone i.m. (50 mg/day), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) (2000 IU every three days), progesterone vaginal cream (100 mg/day) or nothing (controls) to 176 women treated for assisted procreation. We were not able to show any statistical differences for the percentage of pregnancy rate between groups. The serum progestrerone (P) and 17-ß-estradiol (E2) and E2/P ratio levels of the luteal phase were compared with the control not supplemented group. All the treatments were able to increase significantly the luteal P values versus controls (p<0.01). Moreover, vaginal cream and natural P im significantly decreased E2/P ratio (p<0.05). Serum P levels were more steady with P vaginal cream than im injection. Vaginal cream for better bioavailability and acceptance appear the most suitable and comfortable method for luteal phase support. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Csapo A.I., Pulkkinen M.O., Ruttner B., Sauvage J.P., Wiest W.G. The significance of human corpus luteum in pregnancy maintenance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 112: 1061, 1972. Li T.C., Cooke L.D. Evaluation of luteal phase. Hum. Reprod. 6: 484, 1991. Jones G.S. The luteal phase defect. Fertil. Steril. 27: 351, 1975. Huang K.E., Muechler E.K., Schwartz F.K., Goggin M., Graham M. Serum progesterone levels in women treated with human menopausal gonadrotopin and human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 46: 903, 1986. Daya S. Efficacy of progesterone support in the luteal phase following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: metaanalysis of clinical trials. Hum. Reprod. 3: 731, 1988. Smitz J., Devroey P., Braekmans P., Camus M., Khan I., Staessen C., Van Waesberghe L., Wisanto A., Van Steirtenghem A.C. Management of failed cycles in IVF/GIFT program with the combination of a GnRH analogue and HMG Hum. Reprod. 2: 309, 1987. Smitz J., Devroey P., Camus M., Deshacht J., Khan I., Staessen C., Van Waesberghe L., Wisanto A., Van Steirteghem A.C. The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH agonist/HMG tretment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT. Hum. Reprod. 3: 585, 1988. Kubik C.J. Luteal phase dysfunction following ovulation induction. Semin. Reprod. Endocrinol. 4: 293, 1986. Van Steirteghem A.C., Smitz J., Camus M., Van Waesberghe L., Deschacht J., Khan I., Staessen C., Wisanto A., Bourgain C., Devroey P. The luteal phase after in vitro fertilization and related procedures. Hum. Reprod. 3: 161, 1988. Macnamee M.C., Edwards R.G., Howies C.M. The influence of stimulation regimens and luteal phase support on the outcome of IVF. Hum. Reprod. 3: 43, 1988. Smith E.M., Anthony F.W., Gadd S.C., Masson G.M. Trial of support treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase after treatment with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme. Br. Med. J. 298: 1483, 1989. Belaisch-Allart J., De Mouzon J., Lapouterle C., Mayer M. The effect of HCG supplementation after combined GnRH agonist/HMG treatment in an IVF programme. Hum. Reprod. 5: 163, 1990. Gidley—Baird A.A., O’Neill C., Sinosich M.J., Porter R.N., Pike I.L., Suanders D.M. Failure of implantation in human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer patients: the effect of altered progesterone/estrogen ratios in human and mice. Fertil. Steril. 45: 69, 1986. Smitz J., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A.C. Endocrinology in luteal phase and implantation. Br. Med. Bull. 46: 709, 1990. Lejeune B., Camus M., Deschact J., Leroy F. Differences in the luteal phases after failed or succesfull in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement. J. Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 3: 358, 1986. Buvat J., Marcolin G., Herbaut J.C., Dehaene J.L., Verbeck P., Fourlinnie J.C. A randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotropin support following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 49: 458, 1988. Latouche J., Crumeyrolles—Arias M., Jordan D., Kopp N., Augendre-Ferrante B., Cedard L., Haour F. GnRH receptors in human granulosa cells:anatomical localization and characterization by autoradiographic study. Endocrinology 125: 1739, 1989. Dehou M.F., Lejeune B., Arijs C., Leroy F. Endometrial morphology in stimulated in vitro fertilisation cycles and after steroid replacement therapy in cases of primary ovarian failure. Fertil. Steril. 48: 995, 1987. Brzyski R.G., Hofmann G.E., Scott R.T., Jones H.W. Effects of leuprolide acetate on follicular fluid hormone composition at oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 54: 842, 1990. Yovich J.L., McColm S.C., Yovich J.M., Matson P.L. Early luteal serum progesterone concentrations are higher in pregnancy cycles. Fertil. Steril. 44: 185, 1985. Smitz J., Camus M., Devroey P., Erard P., Wisanto A., Van Steirteghem A.C. Incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after GnRH agonist/hMG superovulation for in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 5: 933, 1990. Lindner C., Braendle W., Kohler S., Bettendorf G. Higher incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after combined GnRH-Agonist-HMG therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 49: 337, 1989. Herman A., Ron-El R., Golan A., Raziel A., Soffler Y., Caspi E. Pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation after luteal human chorionic gonadotrophin in in vitro fertilization stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analog and menotropins. Fertil. Steril. 53: 92, 1990. Antoine J.M., Salat-Baroux J., Alvarez S., Cornet D., Tibi C., Mandelbaum J., Plachot M. Ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophins with or without LHRH analogues in a long protocol for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized comparison. Hum. Reprod. 5: 565, 1990. Garcia J., Jones C., Acosta A., Wright G. Corpus luteum function after follicle aspiration for oocyte retrieval. Fertil. Steril. 36: 565, 1981. Halme J., Hammond M.G., Syrop C.H., Talbert L.M. Peritoneal macrophages modulate granulosa luteal cell progesterone production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 61: 912, 1985. Kinel F.A., Ciaccio L.A. Suppression of immune response by progesterone. Endocrinol. Exp. 14: 27, 1980. Smitz J., Devroey P., Faguer P., Bourgain C., Camus M., Van Steirteghem A.C. A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement. Hum. Reprod. 7: 168, 1992. Enry R., Simoncini C., Chastelliere N., Lignieres B. Variations de la progesterone plasmatique induites par l’administration vaginale d’Utrogestan. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 18: 229, 1989. Devroey P., Palermo G., Bourgain C., Van Waesberghe L., Smitz J. Progesterone administration in patients with absent ovaries. Int. J. Fertil. 34: 188, 1989. Bourgain C., Devroey P., Van Waesberghe L., Smitz J., Van Steirteghem A.C. Effects of natural progesterone on the morphology of the endometrium in patients with primary ovarian failure. Hum. Reprod. 5: 537, 1990. Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Artini, P.G., Volpe, A., Angioni, S. et al. A comparative, randomized study of three different progesterone support of the luteal phase following IVF/ET program. J Endocrinol Invest 18, 51–56 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349699 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349699

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (35)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK