Hysterectomized women with ovarian conservation report more severe climacteric complaints than do normal climacteric women of similar age

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1993 · vol. 168(3) , pp. 765–771 · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90816-9 · PMID:8456877 · W2004549720
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 15 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Women who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation reported more severe climacteric complaints compared to age-matched women with normal climacteric progression.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveOur purpose was to compare the severity of typical climacteric complaints (vasomotor complaints and vaginal dryness) and 21 other complaints, considered atypical for the climacteric, in women with and without a uterus.Study designA cross-sectional population questionnaire survey was sent to all women aged 39 through 60 years in Ede, the Netherlands. Subjects were 986 hysterectomized women (one or both ovaries present) and 5636 normal women (uterus and both ovaries present). Statistical analysis was performed by cross tabulations, chi 2 analysis, analysis of variance, meta-analysis of variance, and ratios.ResultsHysterectomized women, especially those aged 39 to 41 years, report significantly more vasomotor complaints, vaginal dryness, and atypical complaints than do normal climacteric women of the same age. The higher prevalence of typical climacteric complaints in hysterectomized women largely explains their higher level of atypical complaints.ConclusionPhysicians should be alert to typical climacteric complaints after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation, especially in young women, because the literature indicates that hysterectomized women with ovarian conservation are overrepresented with regard to osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, depression, and sexual problems.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (51)

Cited by (15)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:42:59.773506+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK