Uterine adenomyosis. A difficult sonographic diagnosis.

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 45 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This retrospective study found that diffuse uterine enlargement with normal myometrial texture, contour, and cavity echoes suggested adenomyosis, while focal enlargement with abnormal features indicated leiomyoma or other pathology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In an effort to distinguish the appearance of generalized uterine adenomyosis from leiomyoma, a retrospective study was performed on 80 patients who had preoperative uterine sonography. A diagnosis of adenomyosis (eight patients) was suggested if the uterus was diffusely enlarged, but the myometrial texture, contour, and central cavity echoes were each normal. Leiomyoma, or other focal uterine pathology (72 patients) was characterized by focal or globular uterine enlargement with abnormal echo texture and contour, as well as nonvisualization or displacement of the central cavity echo complex. Using these criteria, ultrasound was able to suggest adenomyosis with a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 97%, and a positive predictive value of 71%. Focal pathology was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 63%, and a positive predictive value of 96%. Although irregular myometrial sonolucent zones have previously been reported as characteristic for adenomyosis, this study did not confirm this finding.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Ultrasonography Uterine Neoplasms Adult Aged Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Retrospective Studies Uterine Neoplasms Uterine Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (45)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:30.565292+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK