Diagnostic steps in adenomyosis – an updated review

Corina Grigoriu, Roxana Elena Bohîlțea, Tiberiu Augustin Georgescu, Tiberiu-Augustin Georgescu, Lucica Elena Eddan-Visan, Gina Calinescu, Nicolae Bacalbaşa, Irina Bălescu, Maria Irina Vladareanu, Maria Irina Vlădăreanu, Andra Magdalena Balan
In: Romanian Medical Journal · 2021 · vol. 68(S6) , pp. 60–65 · doi:10.37897/rmj.2021.s6.9 · W4285314523
Review OA: gold CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-10 ⓘ

This review details adenomyosis diagnostic steps using history, clinical exam, and ultrasound/MRI, with definitive diagnosis via histopathology, based on MUSA criteria and FIGO classification.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Adenomyosis is defined by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands and stroma inside the myometrium. Definite diagnosis is made only on hysterectomy specimens, but all the progress in modern imaging techniques has increased the paraclinical diagnostic chances. The diagnostic algorithm is based on patient’s history (main complaints, menstrual, obstetrical and gynecological history), clinical examination, imaging studies – ultrasound and MRI. Definitive diagnosis is certainly histopathological. We present an updated review of diagnostic steps in adenomyosis, based on the existing consensus opinions of experts in the field. The Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group published a consensus statement on terms, definitions and measurements that helps clinicians to characterize uterine pathology, accordingly to the modern classification system for abnormal uterine bleeding implemented by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). The direct signs of adenomyosis are: the myometrial cysts, the non-homogenous myometrium (linear hyperchogenic striae inside the myometrium (the venetian blinds sign), the fan shaped shadowing, hypoechogenic subendometrial zones – lines and buds, hyperechogenic islands, hypoechogenic ill-defined pseudonodularities, ill-defined endometrial-myometrial delimitation as irregular or thick junctional zone. The indirect signs of adenomyosis are: globular, enlarged uterus; asymmetrical myometrial walls; linear, translesional vascularization; a retroverted uterus, with a characteristic appearance of the endometrium (the question mark sign). Ademoyosis has nowadays good criteria of non-invasive diagnosis and the appropriate diagnosis algorithm should be applied in all women with complaints of bleeding. Ultrasound imaging requires no special preparation, has no contraindication, is available and cost-effective. Ultrasound accuracy is very good in diagnosing adenomyosis, leading to prompt treatment in younger patients, who are especially interested in conserving their reproductive function.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (17)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK