Cases
A 47-year old woman was admitted in our emergency department after suffering from
severe abdominal pain in the hypogastric and pelvic regions for two weeks. Her
condition worsened significantly three days prior to admission. She was vomiting and
had nausea and anorexia. Her last period had occurred three weeks prior to
admission. The patient was pale and feeling ill, but did not show signs of toxicity.
Her heart rate was consistently at 110; her blood pressure was 100/70 mmHg; her oral
temperature was 38ºC; and her tilt test was negative. Her abdomen was soft,
non-distended, and she complained of mild tenderness to palpation. On auscultation,
her bowel sounds were normal. Rectal and vaginal examinations were unremarkable.
Chest X rays and ECG were both normal. Baseline workup revealed a WBC of 9700, Hb of
11, and a platelet count of 45300. Amylase, lipase, and aminotransferase readings
were normal and the patient had normal bowel movements. She reported a history of
dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia started in her teen years. The rest of her medical
history was unremarkable and she also had a normal pregnancy 14 years prior. CT
scans from 10 days prior to admission showed the large loops of her small bowel were
dilated down to the right side of the pelvic cavity. Colonoscopy, endoscopy, and
upper gastrointestinal series with Gastrografin carried out a week before
hospitalization were normal. Ultrasound examination showed an isoechoic hemorrhagic
or endometrial cyst measuring 25×15mm in diameter consistent with a ruptured
ovarian cyst, with mild to moderate amounts of fluid in the pelvis and abdomen. The
patient was in observation for six hours and her condition deteriorated. Abdominal
tenderness worsened, the patient became oliguric, and her Hb level dropped to
9.6.
The tentative diagnosis was acute abdomen due to a ruptured cyst and persistent
bleeding. She was sent to the operating room and had her abdomen opened with a
midline incision. Approximately two liters of bloody ascites were found, and a
sample was sent for cytology testing. A perforation measuring 20mm in diameter was
seen in the paramesenteric portion of the ileocecal part of the colon. The
perforation was sealed with omentum and was surrounded with pus and fecal material.
The patient underwent a right hemicolectomy and a primary end-to-end
anastomosis.
Histopathology tests revealed the ascites fluid had blood cells and reactive
mesothelial cells and no sign of malignancy. Samples of the terminal ileum, right
colon, and omentum revealed endometriosis with secondary ulceration, perforation,
and inflammatory changes of the bowel wall ( Figure
1 ). The omentum was unremarkable.
Figure 1 Endometriosis with secondary ulceration, perforation, and inflammatory
changes of the bowel wall
Endometriosis with secondary ulceration, perforation, and inflammatory
changes of the bowel wall
Intro
Endometriosis is the proliferation of endometrial glands in different parts of the
peritoneum, causing inflammation, scars, infertility, and pain ( Donnez et al ., 2002 ). The
condition affects 2-10% of women of reproductive age ( Giudice & Kao, 2004 ). Symptoms may vary from one individual to the
next, but they appear mostly during the menstrual period. They range from
dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and dyspareunia to bowel
disturbances. The rectum and the sigmoid colon are often involved, while the ileum
is rarely compromised (4.1%) ( Tong et
al ., 2013 ). Most patients with endometriosis are diagnosed
between the ages of 34 and 40 years ( Dimoulios
et al ., 2003 ). The diagnosis of bowel endometriosis
is not straightforward, since there is no specific sign to look for in preoperative
examination ( Dimoulios et al .,
2003 ). The patient featured in this case had deep endometriosis of the
terminal ileum with perforation and peritonitis. Although most endometriosis-induced
bowel perforations occur in the puerperal period, our patient was not pregnant.
Discussion
Endometriosis affects 10-15% of women of reproductive age ( Tong et al ., 2013 ). It is mostly a benign
disease, but in rare cases it may cause catastrophic complications needing prompt
medical attention. There are three kinds of endometriosis: superficial peritoneal,
ovarian (endometrioma), and deeply infiltrating endometriosis.
While the prevalence of endometriosis in asymptomatic patients is unknown, surgical
studies of women undergoing unrelated procedures have reported rates ranging between
1 and 7 percent ( Sangi-Haghpeykar & Poindexter,
1995 ). In women with history of endometriosis, rectovaginal or bowel
involvement is seen in 5-25% of the cases ( Wills
et al ., 2008 ). In one series the ileum was involved
in 2-5% of the individuals with bowel or rectovaginal endometriosis ( Bailey et al ., 1994 ). According
to these authors, the most common symptoms seen in women with bowel endometriosis
were abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, palpable or radiographic mass, and
dysmenorrhea ( Bailey et al .,
1994 ). Many women experience diarrhea, constipation, and bloating ( Yantiss et al ., 2001 ). In rare
cases, obstruction ( De Ceglie et
al ., 2008 ), ileus ( Bratu
et al ., 2016 ), intussusceptions ( Ranaweera et al ., 2016 ), and
presumed rectal carcinoma ( Rana et
al ., 2016 ) may occur. Bowel endometriosis primarily affects
the serosa and muscle layers of the bowel ( Decker
et al., 2004 ), while transmural involvement into the
mucosa is rare. Bowel perforation is an uncommon complication that generally occurs
during gestation ( Pisanu et al .,
2010 ). Rising progesterone levels that might decrease implant size can
cause perforation in an already inflamed and weakened bowel ( Pisanu et al ., 2010 ). Transvaginal ultrasound
examination may be helpful in diagnosing the condition (sensitivity 43.7%;
specificity 50%) ( Tong et al .,
2013 ). In most cases, it may determine whether the ovaries have been
involved. MRI is currently one of the most accurate methods to diagnose bowel
endometriosis (sensitivity 77-93%) (Tong et al ., 2013).
Nonetheless, laparoscopy is still the gold standard ( Albareda et al ., 2016 ).
Surgery is the treatment of choice in complicated bowel endometriosis (obstruction,
bleeding, and perforation). The choice of approach is based on surgeon experience
and the extension, location, and degree of implant infiltration. Laparoscopy should
be attempted whenever possible ( Decker et
al ., 2004 ). Late diagnosis of all forms of endometriosis is
still an issue. Future studies should explore better ways to diagnose bowel
endometriosis before the rise of complications.
Conclusions
Albeit rare, bowel perforations caused by endometriosis should be considered in the
differential diagnosis of women of reproductive age with abdominal pain.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.