Évaluation et prise en charge des dysménorrhées lors d’une consultation de contraception par les médecins généralistes de Haute Normandie

Mathieu Cassagne
In: https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01235795 · 2015 · W2293280913
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

A survey of general practitioners in Haute-Normandy found that dysmenorrhea is inadequately screened for and managed during contraception consultations, with confusion and lack of training hindering effective diagnosis and treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text ⓘ

I can’t access the paper content because the provided text is blocked by an anti-bot page (“Making sure you're not a bot!”), so there are no study methods, population details, or findings available to summarize. Since the actual biomedical research text is inaccessible, I can’t accurately report what the paper studied, its key results, or any limitations it explicitly states. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis in the content available to me; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objectif : Evaluer le depistage et la prise en charge therapeutique des dysmenorrhees au cours d’une consultation de contraception par des medecins generalistes. Materiel et methodes : Nous avons realise une etude descriptive basee sur un questionnaire evaluant le depistage et le traitement des dysmenorrhees au cours d’une consultation de mise en place ou de renouvellement d’une contraception par les praticiens haut-normands. Le questionnaire a ete valide et envoye par l’Union Regionale des Professionnels de Sante (URPS) a 830 praticiens de Haute Normandie. Resultats : Parmi les 91 medecins generalistes inclus (MGI), plus de la moitie (54.9 %) differencient les dysmenorrhees des « douleurs de regles ». 42.9 % d’entre eux pensent que les douleurs abdominales sont un phenomene normal au cours des regles. Lors de l’interrogatoire en consultation de contraception, les douleurs abdominales pendant les regles ne sont recherchees que par ¾ des MGI tandis que d’autres signes tels que l’HTA, le tabac ou le diabete sont demandes de facon quasi systematique. 83.5 % des praticiens affirment evaluer l’importance des douleurs. Au niveau therapeutique, 20.9 % des MGI affirment que la presence de douleurs n’influence pas le choix de traitement contraceptif. Pour 93.4% des MGI, prescrire la pilule en continu n’est pas nefaste. En cas de dysmenorrhees, plus de la moitie des MGI (51.6 %) prescrivent la pilule en continu. En cas de decouverte de douleurs lors d’un renouvellement, ils sont 44% a choisir le schema en continu. Concernant la formation, 48.4 % des MGI ont recu une formation a l’endometriose. Ils sont 79.1 % a penser qu’une formation de ce type leur serait utile. Conclusion : Les dysmenorrhees sont insuffisamment prises en compte en consultation de medecine generale. La confusion par les praticiens entre dysmenorrhees et « douleurs de regles » est un frein a un depistage efficace. Par oubli ou minimisation des risques, ces douleurs ne font pas partie des elements cles d’un interrogatoire de contraception. De plus, les femmes en meconnaissent generalement la potentielle gravite. Le diagnostic et le traitement sont donc souvent inadaptes. Une formation appropriee des medecins, une information des patientes et la mise au point de recommandations de bonne pratique seraient benefiques.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK