Laparoscopic management of tubo-ovarian abscesses

In: Surgical Endoscopy · 2000 · vol. 14(10) , pp. 948–950 · doi:10.1007/s004640000249 · PMID:11080409 · W2038386038
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

Laparoscopic treatment of tubo-ovarian abscesses shows that organ-preserving procedures result in fewer complications than ablative treatments, regardless of age or fertility desire.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This retrospective chart review evaluated 60 women with tubo-ovarian abscesses treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics from 1994 to 1998, comparing laparoscopic organ-preserving treatment (incision of the abscess cavity and lavage) in 25 women with ablative treatment (laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy) in 35 women, with telephone interviews used to assess operative and reproductive outcomes. The organ-preserving group had no operative complications or serious systemic sequelae except one postoperative readmission for lower pelvic pain, whereas the ablative group showed significantly higher rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications including intestinal perforation requiring laparotomy, multiple organ or vessel injuries, fever, bowel obstruction, and leg thrombosis. The paper reports no significant baseline differences between groups in BMI, duration of pelvic pain, admission labs, ultrasound abscess size, or extent of abscess at laparoscopy. The authors’ limitation is that this was a non-randomized retrospective study with telephone follow-up. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,239 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background The laparoscopic management of tubo-ovarian abscesses (TOA) was evaluated. The study sought to answer the following question: Does operative laparoscopy with only incision of the abscess cavity and lavage (organpreserving treatment) improve intraoperative and postoperative safety and long-term prospects of fertility as compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy (ablative treatment)?

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 60 patients with TOA undergoing laparoscopic treatment in combination with broad-spectrum antibiotics from 1994 to 1998 was performed. Patients not wishing to have children underwent salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy, whereas patients wishing to remain fertile were treated by means of an organpreserving procedure. To investigate the operative and reproductive outcome, patients were interviewed by telephone.

Results

Of 60 women with TOA, 25 were treated laparoscopically, preserving the internal genital organs, and 35 underwent ablative treatment. Apart from one postoperative readmission because of lower pelvic pain in the organpreserving group, there were no operative complications or serious systemic sequelae. In contrast, there was a significantly higher incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications when ablative treatment was performed: one intestinal perforation requiring subsequent laparotomy, four serosal lesions, two lesions of the greater omentum, two lacerated collaterals of the internal iliac artery, one postoperative fever higher than 38°C for 2 days, two bowel obstructions, one thrombosis of the upper leg, and one thrombosis of the lower leg. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups in body mass index, duration of pelvic pain, laboratory findings at admission, ultrasonic assessment of abscess size, and the extent of the abscess at laparoscopy.

Conclusions

When laparoscopic treatment of TOA is performed, organ-preserving treatment should be chosen irrespective of the patient’s age or desire to have children because of the risk of complications. Similar content being viewed by others

References

DeWilde R, Hesseling M (1995) Tube-preserving diagnostic operative laparoscopy in pyosalpinx. Gynaecol Endosc 4: 105–108 Grazia Porpora M., Gomel V (1997) The role of laparoscopy in the management of pelvic pain in women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril 68: 765–779 Henry-Suchet J, Soler A., Loffredo V (1984) Laparoscopic treatment to tubo-ovarian abscesses. J Reprod Med 8: 579 Johns DA (1994) Laparoscopic treatment of tubo-ovarian abscess. In: Sutton C, Diamand M (eds) Endoscopic surgery of gynaecologists, third printing. W. B. Saunders, London, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, pp 154–158 Kaplan AL, Jacobs WM, Ehresman JB (1967) Aggressive management of pelvic abscess. Am J Obstet Gynec 98: 482–487 Kolmorgen K, Seidenschnur G, Dobreff U (1988) Diagnosis and surgical therapy of suppurative inflammations of the adnexa. Zentralbl Gynakol 110: 423–428 Landers DV, Sweet RL (1985) Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of tuboovarian abscess. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 1098–1110 Mecke H, Semm K, Freys I, Gent H (1991) Pelvic abscesses: pelviscopy or laparotomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 31: 231–234 Nezhat CR (1995) Operative gynecologic laparoscopy: principles and technique. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill New York, St Louis, San Francisco, London, Milan, Sydney, Toronto, Tokyo, pp 185–201 Reich H, McGlynn F (1987) Laparoscopic treatment of tubo-ovarian and pelvic abscesses. J Reprod Med 32: 747–752 Rivlin ME, Hunt JA (1977) Ruptured tuboovarian abscess: is hysterectomy necessary? Obstet Gynecol 50: 518–522 Rizk P (1995) Operative laparoscopy in the management of tuboovarian abscess. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2(4, Suppl): 46 Author information Authors and Affiliations Additional information Online publication: 29 August 2000 Online publication: 9 August 2000 Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Buchweitz, O., Malik, E., Kressin, P. et al. Laparoscopic management of tubo-ovarian abscesses. Surg Endosc 14, 948–950 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000249 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000249

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (11)

Cited by (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:53:02.049147+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK