Second-line MRI after expert transvaginal ultrasound in selected patients with suspected complex deep endometriosis: A prospective cohort study

Mira Rehal, Malin Brunes, Takayuki Suzuki, E. Epstein, Elisabeth Epstein, Epstein E
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026 · doi:10.1111/aogs.70372 · PMID:42922369 · W7223320178
OA: gold CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-26 ⓘ

In selected patients with suspected deep endometriosis, combining second-line MRI with expert transvaginal ultrasound increased detection of rectosigmoid and uterosacral ligament lesions but reduced specificity compared to ultrasound alone.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the added diagnostic yield of second-line magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after expert transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) for preoperative mapping of deep endometriosis (DE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, women with suspected DE scheduled for surgery after expert ultrasound were included. TVS was performed according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) protocol. MRI was selectively performed as a second-line investigation in patients with suspected advanced disease, inconclusive TVS, or advanced symptoms despite negative TVS findings. Surgical visualization served as the primary reference standard, with histopathology used as a secondary reference standard when available. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and Cohen's κ) was assessed for TVS, MRI, and their combination, and stratified by prior surgical status. For the combined approach, a positive result was defined as a positive finding on either modality (TVS or MRI), representing a rule-out strategy. RESULTS: Among 221 women with suspected deep endometriosis, 189 underwent surgery, of whom 112 had both TVS and MRI; 55 had previous abdominal surgery. Combined imaging improved sensitivity for rectosigmoid DE (+10.3%; +6 true positives (TP), +3 false positives (FP)) and uterosacral ligament involvement (+29.2%; +14 TP, +12 FP) but reduced specificity for endometriomas (-19.0%; true negatives (TN) 18 to 14), obliteration of the pouch of Douglas (-13.3%; TN 14 to 8), and uterosacral ligaments (-20.3%; TN 35 to 23). Most lesions missed by TVS were in the mid or upper rectum. Accuracy for the urinary bladder and ureters decreased with the addition of MRI (82.2% to 75.7%). Sensitivity for rectosigmoid lesions was higher with the combined method (TVS + MRI) in women with prior surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Among selected complex patients undergoing second-line MRI after expert TVS, combined imaging increased detection of rectosigmoid and uterosacral ligament lesions, but at the cost of reduced specificity. The sensitivity for rectosigmoid disease was greatest among patients with prior abdominal surgery, although this subgroup finding should be considered exploratory. These findings are consistent with a selective rather than routine role for MRI after expert TVS.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (24)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:09:08.764285+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:01:36.263981+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:03:16.172355+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK