Head-to-head prospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in patients undergoing surgery for deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification
article
OA: hybrid
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This study found ultrasonography had higher specificity for pelvic adhesions and comparable sensitivity and specificity to MRI for deep endometriosis across #Enzian compartments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) vs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative detection of endometriosis using the #Enzian classification system.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of postmenarchal premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopy between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2024 in a tertiary referral center for clinical suspicion of endometriosis. All women underwent both transvaginal and transabdominal US imaging, according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) protocol, as well as MRI evaluation. The sonologist and the radiologist were blinded to each other's results. The diagnostic performance of US and MRI were determined for the following #Enzian compartments: O (ovarian endometriosis), T (adhesions at the level of the tubo-ovarian unit), A (deep endometriosis (DE) in the vagina, rectovaginal septum and torus uterinus), B (DE in the uterosacral ligament, cardinal ligament, parametrium and pelvic sidewall), C (DE in the rectosigmoid bowel), FI (lesions in other intestinal locations), FB (urinary bladder involvement), FU (ureteric involvement) and FO (lesions in other extragenital locations). The sensitivity and specificity were compared between imaging modalities using McNemar's test. Concordance between preoperative imaging and surgical assessment of #Enzian severity grade for endometriotic lesions/adhesions in #Enzian compartments O, T, A, B and C was assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 463 women who underwent laposcopy for diagnosis and excisional treatment of endometriosis were enrolled in the study. For the detection of endometriotic lesions/adhesions in #Enzian compartments Oleft, Oright, Tleft, Tright, A, Bleft, Bright, C, FI, FU, FB and FO, US had a sensitivity of 97.52%, 97.22%, 85.15%, 85.26%, 92.66%, 88.81%, 86.79%, 95.79%, 75.00%, 76.19%, 83.72% and 60.00%, respectively, and a specificity of 96.77%, 97.73%, 96.63%, 94.79%, 91.02%, 96.66%, 96.92%, 95.60%, 98.77%, 97.96%, 99.05% and 99.56%, respectively. For MRI, the corresponding values for sensitivity were 95.04%, 94.44%, 77.23%, 74.74%, 90.37%, 88.06%, 90.57%, 94.21%, 83.93%, 71.43%, 74.42% and 90.00%, and those for specificity were 95.89%, 95.75%, 92.70%, 89.86%, 93.47%, 96.05%, 94.96%, 94.14%, 97.05%, 99.10%, 98.57% and 98.90%. US had significantly higher specificity in #Enzian compartment T on both the left (P = 0.0336) and right (P = 0.0153) sides compared with MRI, but no other comparisons of sensitivity or specificity between US and MRI showed statistically significant differences. US showed higher exact concordance with surgical assessment in severity grading for lesions/adhesions in the adnexa than did MRI (Oleft, 96.3% vs 94.8%; Oright, 97.2% vs 94.6%; Tleft, 93.9% vs 89.0%; Tright, 92.6% vs 86.7%). For DE nodules, US showed a 3.1 percentage point higher exact concordance with laparoscopy compared with MRI in #Enzian compartment C (94.0% vs 90.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: US evaluation following the IDEA protocol has significantly higher specificity compared with that of MRI for pelvic adhesions in #Enzian compartment T. However, US and MRI have similarly high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DE in all relevant #Enzian compartments. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (47)
- Accuracy of sonography for non‐invasive detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification: prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study via openalex
- Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium via openalex
- Comparison of #Enzian classification and revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stages for the description of disease extent in women with deep endometriosis via openalex
- Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Comparison Between 2‐Dimensional Ultrasonography (US), 3‐Dimensional US, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging via openalex
- Deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach from the ENDOVALIRM group via openalex
- Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Diagnostic accuracy of the IDEA protocol for non invasive diagnosis of rectosigmoid DE - a prospective cohort study via openalex
- Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics via openalex
- Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel via openalex
- European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis via openalex
- Imagerie préopératoire dans l’endométriose profonde : échographie pelvienne, écho-endoscopie rectale et IRM via openalex
- Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal resection in patients with rectal endometriosis: a randomized, controlled trial via openalex
- Lesion-to-anal-verge distance in rectosigmoid endometriosis on transvaginal sonography vs magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study via openalex
- Low anterior resection syndrome following different surgical approaches for low rectal endometriosis: A retrospective multicenter study via openalex
- Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management via openalex
- Proposed technique to visualize and classify uterosacral ligament deep endometriosis with and without infiltration into parametrium or torus uterinus via openalex
- Rectal endometriosis: predictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection via openalex
- Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research via openalex
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group via openalex
- Systematic interpretation and structured reporting for pelvic magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients with endometriosis: value added for improved patient care via openalex
- The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non‐invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis via openalex
- The value of MRI in assessing parametrial involvement in endometriosis via openalex
- Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis involving uterosacral ligaments, torus uterinus and posterior vaginal fornix: prospective study via openalex
- Transvaginal ultrasound <i>vs</i> magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis via openalex
- Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility via openalex
- Visualization of sacral nerve roots and sacral plexus on gynecological transvaginal ultrasound: feasibility study via openalex
- W4402556844 via openalex
- W4403053324 via openalex
- W4404058249 via openalex
- W4404705835 via openalex
- W4404836423 via openalex
- W4408657605 via openalex
- W3004386584 via openalex
- W4410794658 via openalex
- W3159182954 via openalex
- W3165294846 via openalex
- W3214092784 via openalex
- W4214754424 via openalex
- W2936493390 via openalex
- W2790501237 via openalex
- W4391610375 via openalex
- W4391785981 via openalex
- W4396699586 via openalex
- W4399128904 via openalex
- W4400781868 via openalex
- W4401798098 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:07:16.479679+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:00:24.528921+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:02:14.335766+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine