Vertebral-spinal endometriosis: a comprehensive narrative review of clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes

review OA: closed public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-11

This review of 14 cases found vertebral-spinal endometriosis, most commonly in the lumbar spine, presents with radicular pain and neurological symptoms, with MRI and histopathology confirming diagnosis and treatment yielding symptom improvement in most patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-11 · read from full text

This PRISMA-guided narrative review synthesized published case reports (14 women aged 20–50) with histologically or radiologically confirmed vertebral-spinal endometriosis from 1968–2025, focusing on presentation, diagnostic workup, and treatment outcomes. The most common symptoms were radicular pain (71.4%), back/lumbosacral pain (64.2%), and urinary/bladder dysfunction (35.7%), with lesions most often in the lumbar spine (78.5%); MRI was used in 92.9% of cases and histopathology confirmed endometriosis in 13/14. Treatments varied (surgery/decompression alone, hormonal therapy alone, or combined approaches), with 57.1% becoming symptom-free or nearly symptom-free and 42.9% improving partially but meaningfully, while recurrence was documented in 2/14 over 6–30 months. The authors emphasize a small evidence base and state that the available data cannot support definitive conclusions about whether lesion location or treatment modality predicts outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — vertebral-spinal endometriosis presenting diagnostic challenges and treatment outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. While typically confined to the pelvis, lesions may occur in extra-pelvic sites, including the vertebral spine. Vertebral-spinal endometriosis (VSE) is extremely rare and often presents with nonspecific pain or neurological symptoms, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. PURPOSE: To comprehensively review the clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and treatment outcomes of VSE, to improve clinical awareness and guide management strategies in spine practice. STUDY DESIGN: Comprehensive review of published case reports, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fourteen female patients, aged 20-50 years, with histologically or radiologically confirmed VSE reported in published case reports between 1968 and 2025. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included symptom resolution or improvement following treatment. Secondary measures included type and location of spinal lesions, diagnostic modalities, histological confirmation, and recurrence rates. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library identified eligible case reports. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and resolved disagreements by consensus. Findings were synthesized narratively, and data are presented descriptively as counts, proportions, and simple summary statistics. RESULTS: Of 188 records screened, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Patients were reproductive-age women (mean age 37.9 ± 8.2 years). A documented prior diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis was present in 4 of 14 cases, although eight patients (8/14 57.1%) had symptoms related to menstrual correlation. The most frequent presenting symptoms were radicular pain (10/14, 71.4%), back or lumbosacral pain (9/14, 64.2%), and urinary or bladder dysfunction (5/14, 35.7%). Lesions predominantly involved the lumbar spine (11/14, 78.5%), with rare thoracic (1/14, 7.1%) and sacral foraminal (2/14, 14.3%) cases. MRI was the primary diagnostic modality (13/14, 92.9%). Histopathology confirmed endometriosis in 13 of 14 cases. Treatments included spinal decompression or lesion excision alone (6/14, 42.9%), hormonal therapy alone (3/14, 21.4%), and combined surgery plus hormonal therapy (5/14, 35.7%). Overall, 8 of 14 patients (57.1%) became symptom-free or nearly symptom-free, and 6 of 14 (42.9%) had partial but clinically meaningful improvement. Recurrent spinal endometriosis was documented in 2 of 14 cases over follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral-spinal endometriosis presents with diverse symptoms and variable treatment responses. MRI and histopathology are essential for diagnosis. The small evidence base precludes definitive conclusions regarding whether lesion location or treatment modality predicts outcomes.
Full text 9,515 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background context Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. While typically confined to the pelvis, lesions may occur in extra-pelvic sites, including the vertebral spine. Vertebral-spinal endometriosis (VSE) is extremely rare and often presents with nonspecific pain or neurological symptoms, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Purpose To comprehensively review the clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and treatment outcomes of VSE, to improve clinical awareness and guide management strategies in spine practice. Study design Comprehensive review of published case reports, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Patient sample Fourteen female patients, aged 20–50 years, with histologically or radiologically confirmed VSE reported in published case reports between 1968 and 2025. Outcome measures Primary outcomes included symptom resolution or improvement following treatment. Secondary measures included type and location of spinal lesions, diagnostic modalities, histological confirmation, and recurrence rates.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library identified eligible case reports. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and resolved disagreements by consensus. Findings were synthesized narratively, and data are presented descriptively as counts, proportions, and simple summary statistics.

Results

Of 188 records screened, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Patients were reproductive-age women (mean age 37.9 ± 8.2 years). A documented prior diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis was present in 4 of 14 cases, although eight patients (8/14 57.1%) had symptoms related to menstrual correlation. The most frequent presenting symptoms were radicular pain (10/14, 71.4%), back or lumbosacral pain (9/14, 64.2%), and urinary or bladder dysfunction (5/14, 35.7%). Lesions predominantly involved the lumbar spine (11/14, 78.5%), with rare thoracic (1/14, 7.1%) and sacral foraminal (2/14, 14.3%) cases. MRI was the primary diagnostic modality (13/14, 92.9%). Histopathology confirmed endometriosis in 13 of 14 cases. Treatments included spinal decompression or lesion excision alone (6/14, 42.9%), hormonal therapy alone (3/14, 21.4%), and combined surgery plus hormonal therapy (5/14, 35.7%). Overall, 8 of 14 patients (57.1%) became symptom-free or nearly symptom-free, and 6 of 14 (42.9%) had partial but clinically meaningful improvement. Recurrent spinal endometriosis was documented in 2 of 14 cases over follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 30 months.

Conclusions

Vertebral-spinal endometriosis presents with diverse symptoms and variable treatment responses. MRI and histopathology are essential for diagnosis. The small evidence base precludes definitive conclusions regarding whether lesion location or treatment modality predicts outcomes. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Kale A, s. Baydili KN, Keles E, Gundogdu E, Usta T, Oral E (2022) Comparison of Isolated Sciatic Nerve and Sacral Nerve Root Endometriosis: A Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(8):943–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.05.017 Ye H, Shen C, Quan Q, Xi M, Li L (2023) Endometriosis of the skeletal muscular system (ESMS): a systematic review. BMC Womens Health 23(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02184-8 Ferrero S, Gazzo I, Crosa M et al (2024) Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology Impact of surgery for endometriosis on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 95(March):102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102496 Monnin N, Fattet AJ, Koscinski I, Endometriosis (2023) Update of Pathophysiology, (Epi) Genetic and Environmental Involvement. Biomedicines 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030978 Cricco C, Daugenti A, Angilecchia D, Ceron D (2021) Differential diagnosis of endometriosis in patient with nonspecific low back pain: A case report. J Bodyw Mov Ther 27(2021):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.019 Silva de Barros A, Mesquita Magalhães G, Darc de Menezes Braga L et al Musculoskeletal evaluation of the lower pelvic complex in women with endometriosis: A case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Published online 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.030 Görtzen A, Hansten RL, Lang W, Veh RW (1995) Intraspinal endometriosis as a possible cause of recurrent back pain and leg monoparesis. Eur J Neurol 2(1):51–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-1331.1995.TB00093.X Steinberg JA, Gonda DD, Muller K, Ciacci JD (2014) Endometriosis of the conus medullaris causing cyclic radiculopathy: Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 21(5):799–804. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.SPINE14117 Dongxu Z, Fei Y, Xing X, Bo-Yin Z, Qingsan Z (2014) Low back pain tied to spinal endometriosis. Eur Spine J 23(SUPPL2):214–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2988-x Lombardo L, Mateos JH, Barroeta FF (1968) Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to endometriosis of the spinal canal. Neurology 18(5):423–426. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.18.5.423 Gomez D, Kottegoda G, Gunawardana T, Pirakash P, Attanayake D (2023) Recurrent intramedullary endometriosis of the conus medullaris: A case report of diagnostic pitfalls and a review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 113(November 2023):109041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109041 Nagra I, Stirling AJ, James SLJ (2010) A 45-year-old woman with a pre-sacral mass lesion: diagnosis and discussion. Skeletal Radiol 39(2):199–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0832-5 Beck TB, Carbonar MBF, Hanel R, Beck RT, Carbonar F (2021) Intramedullary Endometriosis of the Conus Medullaris. Cureus 13(4):13–16. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14581 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583 Cui LL, Cao J, Bin, Fan GG, Lin XY, Xu K (2014) Development of intraspinal ectopic endometrial tissue in connection with tethered cord syndrome. Intern Med 53(23):2741–2743. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2266 Qu LR, Zhao DX, Zhong YP, Guo K, Li-rong B (2011) 椎管内子宫内膜异位侵及椎骨一例 中华病理学杂志 40(12):846–847. https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0529-5807.2011.12.014 Sun Z, Wang Y, Zhao L, Ma L (2002) Intraspinal endometriosis: a case report. Chin Med J (Engl). 115(4):622–3. PMID: 12133314 Agrawal A, Shetty BJP, Makannavar JH, Shetty L, Shetty J, Shetty V (2006) Intramedullary endometriosis of the conus medullaris: Case report. Neurosurgery 59(2):2–4. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000223375.23617.DC Jeswani (2011) Endometriosis in the Lumbar Plexus Mimicking a Nerve Sheath Tumor. World J Oncol 2(6):314–318. https://doi.org/10.4021/wjon413w Chan-Tiopianco M, Huang CY, Jiang LY, Lai CR, Wang PH, Chen YJ (2020) Endometriosis of the Paralumbar Muscles: A Case Report and Literature Review. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 9(3):170. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_81_19 Sahu RN, Tungaria A, Pal L, Kumar R (2013) Endometriosis of conus medullaris: A case report. Br J Neurosurg 27(6):842–844. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.795519 Lemos N, Kamergorodsky G, Ploger C, Castro R, Schor E, Girão M (2012) Sacral Nerve Infiltrative Endometriosis Presenting as Perimenstrual Right-sided Sciatica and Bladder Atonia: Case Report and Description of Surgical Technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(3):396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.02.001 Cromeens MG, Carey ET, Robinson WR, Knafl K, Thoyre S Timing, delays and pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis : a scoping review protocol. Published online 2021:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049390 Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions A.K. - Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting of the manuscript, Administrative support.I.C. - Conception and design, Acquisition and data, Statistical analysisA.U. - Acquisition and data, Analysis and interpretation of dataG.G. - Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.R.H. - Drafting of the manuscript, Supervision. S.A. - Drafting of the manuscript, Administrative support.All authors reviewed the manuscript. Corresponding authors Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Khadmy, A., Cohen, I., Ben Uri, A. et al. Vertebral-spinal endometriosis: a comprehensive narrative review of clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes. Eur Spine J (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10134-9 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10134-9

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:15:18.721777+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:09:02.665346+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:10:44.647743+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:29:46.044917+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine