THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICE THERAPY, SURGICAL TREATMENT, RELUGOLIX COMBINATION THERAPY, AND DIENOGEST

In: International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · 2026 · vol. 2(1(49)) · doi:10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4910 · W7139943975
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This review compares the effectiveness and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs, relugolix therapy, surgery, and dienogest for endometriosis, finding that hormonal options offer the best long-term balance while surgery and relugolix are for specific cases.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This comparative literature review evaluated evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on four treatment modalities for endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), oral relugolix combination therapy, surgical intervention (especially laparoscopic excision), and dienogest, focusing on pain reduction, safety, and long-term management considerations. Across the reviewed options, the paper reports meaningful pain relief, with surgery described as offering more rapid symptom improvement, particularly for deep infiltrating endometriosis, but also carrying invasiveness and recurrence risk. It characterizes LNG-IUS and dienogest as minimally invasive hormonal approaches with sustained analgesic efficacy and favorable safety profiles, while describing relugolix combination therapy as potent for severe symptoms with acceptable long-term safety when combined with add-back therapy, noting cost and monitoring requirements as potential limiting factors. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it compares LNG-IUS, surgical treatment, relugolix combination therapy, and dienogest for symptom control and safety.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent disease affecting women of reproductive age, associated with chronic pelvic pain, impaired fertility, and significant impairment of quality of life. The heterogeneous clinical presentation, variable disease severity, and high recurrence rates make therapeutic decision-making particularly challenging. This review summarizes and critically compares current evidence regarding four commonly used treatment modalities: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), relugolix combination therapy, surgical intervention, and dienogest. The analysis focuses on their effectiveness in symptom reduction, safety profile, and suitability for long-term management. A review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that all reviewed modalities provide meaningful pain relief, though clinical applicability differs substantially. Surgical treatment, particularly laparoscopic excision, offers rapid symptom improvement, especially in deep infiltrating endometriosis, but is limited by invasiveness and recurrence risk. Dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system represent minimally invasive hormonal options with sustained analgesic efficacy and favorable safety profiles, making them valuable for long-term disease control and postoperative maintenance. Relugolix combination therapy has emerged as a potent oral treatment for severe symptoms with acceptable long-term safety when combined with add-back therapy, although cost and monitoring requirements may limit its use. No single therapeutic approach can be universally recommended for all patients. Optimal management requires an individualized strategy that balances efficacy, safety, and long-term tolerability. Minimally invasive hormonal therapies offer the most favorable balance for long-term management, while surgery and relugolix therapy remain essential options for selected or refractory cases.
Full text 13,968 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICE THERAPY, SURGICAL TREATMENT, RELUGOLIX COMBINATION THERAPY, AND DIENOGEST DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4910Keywords: Endometriosis, Chronic Pelvic Pain, Hormonal Treatment, Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System, Relugolix, DienogestAbstract Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent disease affecting women of reproductive age, associated with chronic pelvic pain, impaired fertility, and significant impairment of quality of life. The heterogeneous clinical presentation, variable disease severity, and high recurrence rates make therapeutic decision-making particularly challenging. This review summarizes and critically compares current evidence regarding four commonly used treatment modalities: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), relugolix combination therapy, surgical intervention, and dienogest. The analysis focuses on their effectiveness in symptom reduction, safety profile, and suitability for long-term management. A review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that all reviewed modalities provide meaningful pain relief, though clinical applicability differs substantially. Surgical treatment, particularly laparoscopic excision, offers rapid symptom improvement, especially in deep infiltrating endometriosis, but is limited by invasiveness and recurrence risk. Dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system represent minimally invasive hormonal options with sustained analgesic efficacy and favorable safety profiles, making them valuable for long-term disease control and postoperative maintenance. Relugolix combination therapy has emerged as a potent oral treatment for severe symptoms with acceptable long-term safety when combined with add-back therapy, although cost and monitoring requirements may limit its use. No single therapeutic approach can be universally recommended for all patients. Optimal management requires an individualized strategy that balances efficacy, safety, and long-term tolerability. Minimally invasive hormonal therapies offer the most favorable balance for long-term management, while surgery and relugolix therapy remain essential options for selected or refractory cases. References Adachi, K., Takahashi, K., Nakamura, K., Otake, A., Sasamoto, N., Miyoshi, Y., Shioji, M., Yamamoto, Y., Fujitani, M., Wakimoto, A., Tokuhira, A., Kobayashi, E., Yoshimura, A., Sawada, K., & Kimura, T. (2016). Postoperative administration of dienogest for suppressing recurrence of disease and relieving pain in subjects with ovarian endometriomas. Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 32(8), 646–649. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2016.1147547 Andres, M.deP., Lopes, L. A., Baracat, E. C., & Podgaec, S. (2015). Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis: systematic review. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 292(3), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3681-6 Arcoverde, F. V. L., Andres, M. P., Borrelli, G. M., Barbosa, P. A., Abrão, M. S., & Kho, R. M. (2019). Surgery for Endometriosis Improves Major Domains of Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 26(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774 As-Sanie, S., Abrao, M. S., Reznichenko, G., Wilk, K., Zhong, Y., Perry, J., Hunsche, E., Soulban, G., & Becker, C. M. (2024). Impact of relugolix combination therapy on functioning and quality of life in women with endometriosis-associated pain. Fertility and sterility, 122(4), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.06.009 Becker, C. M., Johnson, N. P., As-Sanie, S., Arjona Ferreira, J. C., Abrao, M. S., Wilk, K., Imm, S. J., Mathur, V., Perry, J. S., Wagman, R. B., & Giudice, L. C. (2024). Two-year efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy in women with endometriosis-associated pain: SPIRIT open-label extension study. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 39(3), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead263 Carballo García, A., Fernández Rísquez, A. C., Delgado García, S., Romero Duarte, P., & Presa Lorite, J. C. (2025). Relugolix in Monotherapy and Combined Therapy for the Treatment of Uterine Diseases and Its Effects on Bones: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines, 13(8), 1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081851 Cocks, R. M., Mooney, S. S., & Grover, S. R. (2025). Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device: An Effective Treatment for Symptoms of Persistent Pelvic Pain. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 65(6), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70042 da Costa Porto, B. T., Ribeiro, P. A., Kuteken, F., Ohara, F., & Abdalla Ribeiro, H. S. (2024). Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus dienogest effect on quality of life of women with deep endometriosis: a randomized open-label clinical trial. Women & health, 64(7), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2382418 Duffy, J. M., Arambage, K., Correa, F. J., Olive, D., Farquhar, C., Garry, R., Barlow, D. H., & Jacobson, T. Z. (2014). Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (4), CD011031. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub2 Fenghua, Y., Rong, S., Juan, S., & Guan, L. (2022). Effect of Mirena intrauterine device combined with GNRH-A on endometriosis, sex hormone level and carbohydrate antigen 125. Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France), 68(7), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2022.68.7.4 Fritzer, N., Tammaa, A., Haas, D., Oppelt, P., Renner, S., Hornung, D., Wölfler, M., Ulrich, U., & Hudelist, G. (2016). When sex is not on fire: a prospective multicentre study evaluating the short-term effects of radical resection of endometriosis on quality of sex life and dyspareunia. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 197, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.11.007 Gibbons, T., Georgiou, E. X., Cheong, Y. C., & Wise, M. R. (2021). Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 12(12), CD005072. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005072.pub4 Giudice, L. C., As-Sanie, S., Arjona Ferreira, J. C., Becker, C. M., Abrao, M. S., Lessey, B. A., Brown, E., Dynowski, K., Wilk, K., Li, Y., Mathur, V., Warsi, Q. A., Wagman, R. B., & Johnson, N. P. (2022). Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2). Lancet (London, England), 399(10343), 2267–2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00622-5 Healey, M., Cheng, C., & Kaur, H. (2014). To excise or ablate endometriosis? A prospective randomized double-blinded trial after 5-year follow-up. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 21(6), 999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.002 Kim, H. Y., Song, S. Y., Jung, S. H., Song, H. J., Lee, M., Lee, K. H., Jung, Y. W., & Yoo, H. J. (2022). Long-term efficacy and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system as a maintenance treatment for endometriosis. Medicine, 101(10), e29023. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029023 Lan, S., Ling, L., Jianhong, Z., Xijing, J., & Lihui, W. (2013). Analysis of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis. The Journal of international medical research, 41(3), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060513479865 Liu, Y., Gong, H., Gou, J., Liu, X., & Li, Z. (2021). Dienogest as a Maintenance Treatment for Endometriosis Following Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in medicine, 8, 652505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.652505 Morotti, M., Sozzi, F., Remorgida, V., Venturini, P. L., & Ferrero, S. (2014). Dienogest in women with persistent endometriosis-related pelvic pain during norethisterone acetate treatment. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 183, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.036 Osuga, Y., Seki, Y., Tanimoto, M., Kusumoto, T., Kudou, K., & Terakawa, N. (2021). Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain in a dose-response manner: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fertility and sterility, 115(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.055 Othman, E. R., Al-Hendy, A., Mostafa, R., Lambalk, C. B., & Mijatovic, V. (2024). Oral GnRH Antagonists in Combination with Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate for Pain Relief Associated with Endometriosis: A Review of Evidence of a Novel Class of Hormonal Agents. International journal of women's health, 16, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S442357 Petraglia, F., Hornung, D., Seitz, C., Faustmann, T., Gerlinger, C., Luisi, S., Lazzeri, L., & Strowitzki, T. (2012). Reduced pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: efficacy of long-term dienogest treatment. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 285(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1941-7 Quishpe, M., Endara-Mina, J., Caizapanta, J., Guzmán, A., Tenesaca, D., Asto, D., Mena, O., Rengel, N., Avilés, J., Vaca, G., & Sarmiento-Vallejo, H. (2025). Efficacy of Elagolix and Relugolix for the Treatment of Pelvic Pain in Patients With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. Cureus, 17(9), e92149. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92149 Riley, K. A., Benton, A. S., Deimling, T. A., Kunselman, A. R., & Harkins, G. J. (2019). Surgical Excision Versus Ablation for Superficial Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 26(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.023 Römer T. (2019). Correction to: Long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 299(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4977-0 Strowitzki, T., Marr, J., Gerlinger, C., Faustmann, T., & Seitz, C. (2012). Detailed analysis of a randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of dienogest versus leuprolide acetate in endometriosis. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 117(3), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.009 Sugimoto, K., Nagata, C., Hayashi, H., Yanagida, S., & Okamoto, A. (2015). Use of dienogest over 53 weeks for the treatment of endometriosis. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 41(12), 1921–1926. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12811 Takaesu, Y., Nishi, H., Kojima, J., Sasaki, T., Nagamitsu, Y., Kato, R., & Isaka, K. (2016). Dienogest compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after conservative surgery for endometriosis. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 42(9), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13023 Tiringer, D., Pedrini, A. S., Gstoettner, M., Husslein, H., Kuessel, L., Perricos, A., & Wenzl, R. (2022). Evaluation of quality of life in endometriosis patients before and after surgical treatment using the EHP30 questionnaire. BMC women's health, 22(1), 538. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02111-3 Wang, J., Deng, K., Li, L., Dai, Y., & Sun, X. (2022). Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs. systemic medication or blank control for women with dysmenorrhea: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in global women's health, 3, 1013921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.1013921 Wenzl, A., Wenzl, R., Gstoettner, M., Kuessel, L., Husslein, H., Heine, J., Sandrieser, L., Bekos, C., & Perricos-Hess, A. (2024). Long-Term Follow-Up of the Quality of Life of Endometriosis Patients after Surgery: A Comparative Study. Journal of clinical medicine, 13(18), 5641. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185641 Xin, L., Ma, Y., Ye, M., Chen, L., Liu, F., & Hou, Q. (2023). Efficacy and safety of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 308(4), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06862-0 Xu, X. W., Zhang, Y. W., He, F. F., Wang, L. D., Guan, Y. T., Sun, J., Lin, M., & Hu, Y. (2011). [Evaluation of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in treatment of recurrent endometriosis after conservative surgery]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 46(4), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2011.04.003 Yan, H., Shi, J., Li, X., Dai, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Gu, Z., Zhang, C., & Leng, J. (2022). Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for treating endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility, 118(6), 1102–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.856 Zakhari, A., Edwards, D., Ryu, M., Matelski, J. J., Bougie, O., & Murji, A. (2020). Dienogest and the Risk of Endometriosis Recurrence Following Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 27(7), 1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.007 Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2026 Katarzyna Ścibisz, Karolina Ollik, Kamil Harenza, Mateusz Taranowicz, Olga Kowalczyk, Dominika Zdobylak, Monika Kowalska, Anita Zięba, Michał Domin, Justyna Całka This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles. CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

EHP-30

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltratingchronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (33)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:06:57.717919+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK