Correction to: Long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in clinical practice

Thomas Römer
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2018 · vol. 299(1) , pp. 293 · doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4977-0 · PMID:30467634 · W2901516201
erratum OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This correction to a previous article clarifies that "laparoscopy," not "laparotomy," was the correct surgical procedure mentioned in several sections.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-05 · read from full text ⓘ

This document is a formal correction issued for a previously published retrospective analysis regarding the long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest. The authors identified and rectified typographical errors in the original manuscript where the term 'laparotomy' was incorrectly used instead of 'laparoscopy' across several sections, including the introduction, materials and methods, and discussion. This erratum ensures that the surgical context of the study accurately reflects laparoscopic procedures rather than open abdominal surgery. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically serving as a procedural correction to a study on the efficacy and safety of dienogest therapy for this condition.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, the word laparotomy has been presented in the proofs instead of laparoscopy in the below places.
Full text 1,160 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2019) 299:293 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4977-0 CORRECTION Correction to: Long‑term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in clinical practice Thomas Römer1 Published online: 22 November 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Correction to: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2018) 298:747–753 https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0040 4-018-4864-8 In the original publication of the article, the word ‘lapa - rotomy’ has been presented in the proofs instead of ‘lapa - roscopy’ in the below places: In the first paragraph, 6th line in Introduction section. In the fifth paragraph, 8th line in Introduction section. In the first paragraph, 7th line in Materials and methods section. In the second paragraph, 4th line in Discussion section. The original article can be found online at https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s0040 4-018-4864-8. * Thomas Römer [email protected]; [email protected] 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Academic Hospital Weyertal, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-18T06:10:57.818014+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:25.021412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK