Adhesion formation and reformation after laparoscopic removal of ovarian endometriomas

Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study investigated the incidence and severity of adhesion formation and reformation following laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma removal.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent of adhesion formation after laparoscopic removal of endometriomas. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: Nineteen infertile women with ovarian endometriomas. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent laparoscopic cystectomy with total stripping of the cyst capsule when possible. A second-look laparoscopy was performed after 3 months of postoperative treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The extent of adhesion reformation was dependent on the extent and severity of adhesions at initial laparoscopy. One (5.2%) woman had a residual ovarian endometrioma at second-look laparoscopy. De novo adhesion formation was not seen. Nine women (42.8%) conceived during the postoperative follow-up period (range 11-22 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic removal of endometriomas is effective in eradicating the disease. Adhesions at second-look laparoscopy depend on adhesions at the initial laparoscopy. Crude pregnancy rates are satisfactory in infertile women.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Ovarian Diseases Postoperative Complications Postoperative Complications Adult Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Evaluation Studies as Topic Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Female Humans Humans Infertility, Female

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (29)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:00:26.748804+00:00
europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T22:00:10.289599+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK