A multicentre phase III study comparing efficacy and safety of novel extended-release versus conventional formulation of dydrogesterone in Indian patients with endometriosis

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024 · vol. 13(6) , pp. 1425–1431 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241298 · W4396902896
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This multicenter study found that once-daily extended-release dydrogesterone was as effective and safe as twice-daily conventional dydrogesterone in reducing pelvic pain and endometrioma size in Indian patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This multicentre phase III randomized, double-blind, single-dummy trial in 228 Indian women aged 18–45 with ultrasound-confirmed endometriosis compared once-daily extended-release (ER) dydrogesterone 20 mg versus conventional twice-daily dydrogesterone 10 mg over 90 days, using change in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain score (EAPP) as the primary endpoint. At day 90, both groups showed significant reductions in EAPP from baseline (-34.2±15.3 mm and -33.1±14.8 mm, respectively) with no significant difference between formulations (p=0.53), and both were associated with reduced endometrioma size, lower serum VEGF levels, reduced rescue analgesic use, and improved health-related quality-of-life measures. The safety profile was described as favorable with no significant safety concerns reported, though the abstract does not specify longer-term outcomes beyond the 90-day treatment period. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly evaluates extended-release versus conventional dydrogesterone for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and related biomarkers in affected patients.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of novel once-daily extended-release (ER) dydrogesterone 20 mg versus conventional twice-daily dydrogesterone 10 mg in Indian patients with endometriosis. Methods: A phase III prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-dummy, two-arm, active-controlled, parallel, multicenter study was performed in six gynecology centers across India. The patients of 18 to 45 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis on ultrasonography (USG) and having endometriosis-associated pelvic pain score (EAPP) of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) were randomly assigned to a 1:1 ratio to either once-daily dydrogesterone ER 20 mg or twice-daily dydrogesterone 10 mg arms for a treatment period of 90 days. The primary outcome was a change from baseline in EAPP score at the end of the treatment. Results: A total of 228 patients with a mean age of 31.8±6.9 years were enrolled in the study. At day 90, both the treatment arms showed a significant reduction (p<0.05) in EAPP score from baseline (i.e. -34.2±15.3 mm and -33.1±14.8 mm in once daily dydrogesterone ER and twice daily dydrogesterone 10 mg, respectively), with no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.53). With both formulations, patients experienced a significant reduction in the size of endometrioma, serum vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) levels, use of rescue analgesics, and significant improvement in the health-related quality-of-life parameters. A favorable safety profile of dydrogesterone was confirmed, and no significant safety concerns were reported during the study. Conclusions: Once daily dydrogesterone ER 20 mg and twice daily dydrogesterone 10 mg demonstrated a significant and similar reduction in EAPP and all other secondary parameters along with marked improvements in parameters related to quality of life.
Full text 6,730 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of novel once-daily extended-release (ER) dydrogesterone 20 mg versus conventional twice-daily dydrogesterone 10 mg in Indian patients with endometriosis.

Methods

A phase III prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-dummy, two-arm, active-controlled, parallel, multicenter study was performed in six gynecology centers across India. The patients of 18 to 45 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis on ultrasonography (USG) and having endometriosis-associated pelvic pain score (EAPP) of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) were randomly assigned to a 1:1 ratio to either once-daily dydrogesterone ER 20 mg or twice-daily dydrogesterone 10 mg arms for a treatment period of 90 days. The primary outcome was a change from baseline in EAPP score at the end of the treatment.

Results

A total of 228 patients with a mean age of 31.8±6.9 years were enrolled in the study. At day 90, both the treatment arms showed a significant reduction (p<0.05) in EAPP score from baseline (i.e. -34.2±15.3 mm and -33.1±14.8 mm in once daily dydrogesterone ER and twice daily dydrogesterone 10 mg, respectively), with no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.53). With both formulations, patients experienced a significant reduction in the size of endometrioma, serum vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) levels, use of rescue analgesics, and significant improvement in the health-related quality-of-life parameters. A favorable safety profile of dydrogesterone was confirmed, and no significant safety concerns were reported during the study.

Conclusions

Once daily dydrogesterone ER 20 mg and twice daily dydrogesterone 10 mg demonstrated a significant and similar reduction in EAPP and all other secondary parameters along with marked improvements in parameters related to quality of life. Metrics

References

Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, Bie BD, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400-12. Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C, Timmerman D, D’Hooghe T. High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):68-74. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Marshall LM, Hunter DJ. Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:784-96. Gajbhiye RK, Montgomery G, Pai MV, Phukan P, Shekhar S, Padte K, et al. Protocol for a case-control study investigating the clinical phenotypes and genetic regulation of endometriosis in Indian women: the ECGRI study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e050844. La Rosa VL, De Franciscis P, Barra F, Schiattarella A, Török P, Shah M, et al. Quality of life in women with endometriosis: a narrative overview. Minerva Med. 2020;111(1):68-78. La Rosa VL, De Franciscis P, Barra F, Schiattarella A, Tropea A, Tesarik J, et al. Sexuality in women with endometriosis: a critical narrative review. Minerva Med. 2020;111(1):79-89. National Guideline Alliance (UK). Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2017. Griesinger G, Tournaye H, Macklon N, Petraglia F, Arck P, Blockeel C, et al. Dydrogesterone: pharmacological profile and mechanism of action as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(2):249-59. Rižner TL, Brožič P, Doucette C, Turek-Etienne T, Muller-Vieira U, Sonneveld E, et al. Selectivity and potency of the retroprogesterone dydrogesterone in vitro. Steroids. 2011;76(6):607-15. Johnston WIH. Dydrogesterone and endometriosis. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1976;83(1):77-80. Gerlinger C, Schumacher U, Faustmann T, Colligs A, Schmitz H, Seitz C. Defining a minimal clinically important difference for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain measured on a visual analog scale: analyses of two placebo-controlled, randomized trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:138. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:400-12. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:927-35. Hodgson RM, Lee HL, Wang R, Mol BW, Johnson N. Interventions for endometriosis-related infertility: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:374-82. Harada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y, Hoshiai H, Terawaka N. Low-dose oral contraceptive pill for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a placebo controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1583-8. Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1552-68. Bedaiwy MA, Allaire C, Alfaraj S. Long-term medical management of endometriosis with dienogest and with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and add-back hormone therapy. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:537-48. Casper RF. Progestin-only pills may be a better first-line treatment for endometriosis than combined estrogen-progestin contraceptive pills. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:533-6. Brown J, Crawford TJ, Datta S, Prentice A. Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD001019. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453-7. Sagsveen M, Farmer JE, Prentice A, Breeze A. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003:CD001297. Schweppe K-W. The place of dydrogesterone in the treatment of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Maturitas 2009;65(1):S23-7. Johnston WI. Dydrogesterone and endometriosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976;83:77-80. Walker SM. The treatment of endometriosis with dydrogesterone. Br J Clin Pract. 1983;24:40-6. Trivedi P, Selvaraj K, Mahapatra PD, Srivastava S, Malik S. Effective postlaparoscopic treatment of endometriosis with dydrogesterone. Gynecol Endocrinol 2007;23(1):73-6.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK