Is the dose to inhibit the COX-2 enzyme in nude mice also adequate in ‘human’ endometrial tissues?

letter OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09

This paper questions whether the COX-2 inhibiting dose used in nude mice is effective in human endometrial tissues, noting a lack of supporting evidence despite widespread belief.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

some obvious plausibility, as witness the fact that many critically intelligent people believe it (as I did until it mattered to me and I looked for the evidence).It is apparently so very plausible that no one has bothered to prove it (or to pay attention to such evidence to the contrary as is available in the very references included with these letters).This is much like the legendary double-ovulation origin of natural human dizygotic twinning (Boklage, 2005). ReferencesBoklage CE (1990) Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term.Int J Fertil 35,75-94.Boklage CE (2005) The biology of human twinning: a needed change of perspective.In

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Endometriosis Endometrium Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases Animals Cyclooxygenase 2 Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Endometriosis Endometrium Female Humans Membrane Proteins Mice Mice, Nude Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases Species Specificity

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (3)

References (4)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:35.797702+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK