The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. III. Pitfalls in diagnosis
This paper presents three cases of benign cervical lesions misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma in situ, highlighting diagnostic pitfalls and discussing the differential diagnosis of endocervical glandular abnormalities.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
Cited by (5)
- Presentation of endometriosis of the cervix in cervical smear: a case report and review of literature 2002
- Abnormal cervicovaginal smears due to endometriosis: a continuing problem 2002
- Cervical/vaginal endometriosis with atypia: A cytohistopathologic study 1999
- Cervical endometriosis: a potential pitfall in the evaluation of glandular cells in cervical smears 1997
- Endometrial cells of the "lower uterine segment" (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings: a source of potential diagnostic pitfall 1995
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-24T06:12:55.650802+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:30:31.870046+00:00