A two-third majority of infertile women exhibit endometriosis in pre-ART diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopic chromopertubation: only one-third have a tubal obstruction

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-07

Endometriosis was diagnosed in 67% of infertile women undergoing hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, with primary infertility, dysmenorrhea, and shorter cycles being risk factors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This retrospective study of 300 infertile women with non-male factor infertility evaluated the prevalence and anatomical pattern of endometriosis using combined diagnostic hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic chromopertubation, and compared endometriosis findings with tubal stenosis/occlusion. Endometriosis was diagnosed in 67%, with primary infertility, dysmenorrhea, and shorter cycle length independently associated with detection; the most frequent sites were pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments. Although women with endometriosis had a lower rate of tubal occlusion overall, tubal endometriosis involving a Fallopian tube was associated with higher ipsilateral tubal occlusion, and higher rASRM stage (score III) showed the highest tubal obstruction rate; an explicit limitation is the retrospective design and that it involved pre-ART diagnostic procedures in a single clinical setting. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it quantifies endometriosis prevalence in infertile women assessed with pre-ART hystero-laparoscopy and chromopertubation and relates it to tubal obstruction patterns.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeThis study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women of couples with non-male factor infertility.MethodsA retrospective validation analysis was carried out of consecutive women of infertile couples with non-male factor infertility who received combined diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, in the period from January 2017 to August 2019 in the Department for Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine (n = 300). Type, stage and site of endometriosis were assessed and matched with the occurrence of tubal stenosis. Binary regression analysis was used to estimate the prevalence of endometriosis.ResultsEndometriosis was diagnosed in 67% (n = 201). Primary infertility (OR 1.76; p = 0.036), dysmenorrhea (OR 2.47; p = 0.002), and a shorter cycle length (OR 0.972; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for detection of endometriosis in diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy. The most frequent endometriosis sites were pelvic side wall (53.2%) and uterosacral ligaments (41.8%). Patients with endometriosis showed less often a tubal occlusion (34.32% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.205) and presented a lower rate of bilateral obstruction (9.5% vs. 18.8.%, p = 0.024). Women with endometriosis of a Fallopian tube showed a higher rate of tubal occlusion on the same side (right side p = 0.002; left side p = 0.001). Patients with rASRM score III showed the highest rate of tubal obstruction.ConclusionsThe prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women was higher than expected. The indication for operative infertility diagnostics by minimal invasive techniques should be made much more generous as well as the complete clarification of the causes of female infertility.
Full text 6,819 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women of couples with non-male factor infertility.

Methods

A retrospective validation analysis was carried out of consecutive women of infertile couples with non-male factor infertility who received combined diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, in the period from January 2017 to August 2019 in the Department for Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine (n = 300). Type, stage and site of endometriosis were assessed and matched with the occurrence of tubal stenosis. Binary regression analysis was used to estimate the prevalence of endometriosis.

Results

Endometriosis was diagnosed in 67% (n = 201). Primary infertility (OR 1.76; p = 0.036), dysmenorrhea (OR 2.47; p = 0.002), and a shorter cycle length (OR 0.972; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for detection of endometriosis in diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy. The most frequent endometriosis sites were pelvic side wall (53.2%) and uterosacral ligaments (41.8%). Patients with endometriosis showed less often a tubal occlusion (34.32% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.205) and presented a lower rate of bilateral obstruction (9.5% vs. 18.8.%, p = 0.024). Women with endometriosis of a Fallopian tube showed a higher rate of tubal occlusion on the same side (right side p = 0.002; left side p = 0.001). Patients with rASRM score III showed the highest rate of tubal obstruction.

Conclusions

The prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women was higher than expected. The indication for operative infertility diagnostics by minimal invasive techniques should be made much more generous as well as the complete clarification of the causes of female infertility. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Soliman AM, Yang H, Du EX, Kelley WC (2016) The direct and indirect costs associated with endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Hum Reprod 31(4):712–722 Buck Louis GM, Hediger ML, Peterson CM et al (2011) Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO Study. Fertil Steril 96(2):360–365 Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C et al (2014) ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29(3):400–412 Uccella S, Marconi N, Casarin J et al (2016) Impact of endometriosis on surgical outcomes and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(4):771–778 Righarts A, Osborne L, Connor J, Gilett W (2018) The prevalence and potential determinants of dysmenorrhoea and other pelvic pain in women: a prospective study. BJOG 125:1532–1539 Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Marshall LM, Hunter DJ (2004) Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol 160:784–796 Collins JA, Burrows EA, Wilan AR (1995) The prognosis of live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 64(1):22–28 D’Hooghe TM, Debrock S, Hill JA, Meuleman C (2003) Endometriosis and subfertility: is the realionship resolved? Semin Reprod Med 2182:243–254 Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C, Timmermann D, D’Hooghe TM (2009) High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril 92(1):68–74 Akande VA, Hunt LP, Cahill DJ, Jenkins JM (2004) Differences in time to natural conception between women with unexplained infertility and infertile women with minor endometriosis. Hum Reprod 19(1):96–103 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2012) Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 98(3):591–598 Tomassetti C, D’Hooghe T (2018) Endometriosis and infertility: insights into the causal link and management strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 51:25–33 Harb HM, Gallos ID, Chu J, Harb M, Coomarasamy A (2013) The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 120(11):1308–1320 Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD11031 Tanbo T, Fedorcsak P (2017) Endometriosis-associated infertility: aspects of pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment options. Acta Obstet Gynecol Sacnd 96:659–667 Prescott J, Farland LV, Tobias DK et al (2016) A prospective cohort study of endometriosis and subsequent risk of infertility. Hum Reprod 31:1475–1482 Romanski PA, Brady PC, Farland LV, Thomas AM, Hornstein MD (2019) The effect of endometriosis in the antimüllerian hormone level in infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(6):179–1184 Giudice LC (2010) Clinical practice: endometriosis. N Engl J Med 362(25):2389–2398 Ballard KD, Seaman HE, deVries CS, Wright JT (2008) Can symptomatology help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Findings from a national case-control study-part 1. BJOG 115(11):382–391 Audebert A, Petousis S, Margioula-Siarkou C, Ravanos K, Prapas N, Prapas Y (2018) Anatomic distribution of endometriosis: a reappraisal based on series of 1101 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 230:36–40 Approbato FC, Approbato MS, Rezende DF, Silva TM, Lima YAR, Benetti BBDC (2019) Endometriosis III and IV as a risk factor for tubal obstruction in infertile women. JBRA Assist Reprod. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190004 Younis JS, Shapso N, Fleming R, Ben-Shlomo I, Izhaki I (2019) Impact of unilateral versus bilateral ovarian endometriotic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 25(3):375–391

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Thomas Lehmann, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Documentation, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany, for assistance in project development. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions KN: protocol/project development, data collection and data management and manuscript writing/editing. DB: data collection. RS: data collection. KB: project development. HD: project development. IBR: manuscript writing/editing. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Nicolaus, K., Bräuer, D., Sczesny, R. et al. A two-third majority of infertile women exhibit endometriosis in pre-ART diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopic chromopertubation: only one-third have a tubal obstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 1081–1088 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05479-5 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05479-5

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Hysteroscopy Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Sterilization, Tubal Adult Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Hysteroscopy Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Male Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Sterilization, Tubal

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:11:53.302379+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:11.167363+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK