Efficacy of a combined oral contraceptive containing 0.030 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg dienogest for the treatment of papulopustular acne in comparison with placebo and 0.035 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg cyproterone acetate

Ernesta Palombo‐Kinne, Ilka Schellschmidt, Ulrike Schumacher, T Gräser
In: Contraception · 2008 · vol. 79(4) , pp. 282–289 · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.010 · PMID:19272497 · W2057853681
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study compared the efficacy of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol/dienogest for acne treatment against placebo and ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundAcne is a multifactorial disease characterized by androgenic stimulation of sebaceous glands. Therefore, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing anti-androgenic progestogens are suitable candidates for acne treatment. This study aimed to show that a COC containing the anti-androgen dienogest (DNG) is superior to placebo and not inferior to a COC containing the potent anti-androgen cyproterone acetate (CPA) in improving mild to moderate acne.Study designHealthy women between 16 and 45 years old with mild to moderate facial acne were randomly assigned to receive ethinylestradiol (EE)/DNG (n=525), EE/CPA (n=537) or placebo (n=264) for six cycles in a multinational, multicenter, three-arm, double-blind and randomized trial. The primary efficacy variables were the percentages of change (from baseline to cycle 6) in inflammatory and total lesion count and the percentage of patients with acne improvement according to the Investigator Global Assessment.ResultsAll primary analyses proved that EE/DNG was superior to placebo and non-inferior to EE/CPA (p<.05). For inflammatory lesions, the reduction (+/-SD) rates were -65.6+/-29.9% for EE/DNG, -64.6+/-31.2% for EE/CPA and -49.4+/-41.0% for placebo. For total lesions, the reduction rates were -54.7+/-26.3% for EE/DNG, -53.6+/-27.5% for EE/CPA and -39.4+/-33.6% for placebo. The percentages of patients with improvement of facial acne were 91.9% for EE/DNG, 90.2% for EE/CPA and 76.2% for placebo.ConclusionEE/DNG was superior to placebo, in spite of the prominent placebo effects, and as effective as EE/CPA in the treatment of mild to moderate acne, thus proving a valid option for the treatment of acne in women seeking oral contraception.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:37:04.871248+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-29T07:08:50.896093+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK