Recent Advances and Current Perspectives on Endometrial Receptivity

Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to update readers on our current understanding of endometrial receptivity and to review the literature regarding endometrial assessment and pathologic states which may influence receptivity. Recent Findings Topics discussed include molecular mechanisms implicated in endometrial receptivity on the basis of which three commercially available yet controversial tests have been developed (Endometrial Function Test, Endometrial Receptivity Assay, and ReceptivaDx), as well as current evidence surrounding how common gynecologic conditions such as polyps, fibroids, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis may influence endometrial receptivity and the success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Summary While the sequential action of estrogen and progesterone is central to the development of endometrial receptivity, the exact molecular mechanisms governing the transition from non-receptive to receptive endometrium remain poorly understood. Commercially available tests attempt to harness molecular markers to assess and potentially improve endometrial receptivity; however, current evidence is insufficient to support their routine clinical application. Polyps, fibroids, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis may negatively impact implantation either directly by impeding embryo transport and attachment or indirectly by influencing endometrial receptivity. Given the likely heterogenous genetic construct and molecular expression of any pathologic condition, further research is needed to develop molecular testing to guide approach to clinical treatment. Similar content being viewed by others

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• of major importance Lessey B, Young S. Structure, function, and evaluation of the female reproductive tract. In: Strauss JI, Barbieri R, editors. Yen & Jaffe’s reproductive endocrinology. Philadelphia. 2019; p 206–47. Navot D, Scott RT, Droesch K, Veeck LL, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(1):114–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54069-2. Lessey BA, Killam AP, Metzger DA, Haney AF, Greene GL, McCarty KS Jr. Immunohistochemical analysis of human uterine estrogen and progesterone receptors throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(2):334–40. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-67-2-334. Lee DK, Kurihara I, Jeong JW, et al. Suppression of ERalpha activity by COUP-TFII is essential for successful implantation and decidualization. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(5):930–40. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2009-0531. Large MJ, DeMayo FJ. The regulation of embryo implantation and endometrial decidualization by progesterone receptor signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358(2):155–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.027. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(23):1796–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199906103402304. Messaoudi S, El Kasmi I, Bourdiec A, et al. 15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?. Fertil Res Pract. 2019;5:9. Published 2019 Aug 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0059-7 Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122(2):262–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33500-1. Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(5):1264–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.069. Csapo A, Pulkkinen M, Ruttner B, Sauvage J, Wiest W. The significance of the human corpus luteum in pregnancy maintenance: preliminary studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(8):1061–7. Csapo A, Pulkkinen M, Wiest W. Effects of luteectomy and progesterone replacement therapy in early pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(6):759–65. Csapo A, Pulkkinen M, Kaihola H. The effect of estradiol replacement therapy on early pregnant luteectomized patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;117(7):987–90. Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L. Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: identification of the short luteal phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91:685. Penzias A, Azziz R, Bendikson K, Falcone T, Hansen K, Hill M, Hurd W, Jindal S, Kalra S, Mersereau J, Racowsky C. Diagnosis and treatment of luteal phase deficiency: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):416–23. Crawford NM, Pritchard DA, Herring AH, Steiner AZ. Prospective evaluation of luteal phase length and natural fertility. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:749–55. Filicori M, Butler JP, Crowley WF Jr. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest 1984;73:1638–47 Schliep KC, Mumford SL, Hammoud AO, Stanford JB, Kissell KA, Sjaarda LA, et al. Luteal phase deficiency in regularly menstruating women: prevalence and overlap in identification based on clinical and biochemical diagnostic criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E1007–14. DiLuigi AJ, Nulsen JC. Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on luteal function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(3):258–65. Smitz J, Devroey P, Camus M, Deschacht J, Khan I, Staessen C, et al. The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT. Hum Reprod. 1988;3(5):585–90. Garcia J, Jones GS, Acosta AA, Wright GL. Corpus luteum function after follicle aspiration for oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril. 1981;36(5):565–72. Elsevier Masson SAS. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45852-8. Frydman R, Testart J, Giacomini P, Imbert MC, Martin E, Nahoul K. Hormonal and histological study of the luteal phase in women following aspiration of the preovulatory follicle. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(3):312–7. Yanushpolsky E. Evidence-based use of progesterone during IVF. In: Racowsky C, Schlegel P, Fauser B, Carrell D, editors. Biennial review of infertility. Boston: Springer; 2011. p. 79–90. Fazleabas AT, Kim JJ, Srinivasan S, Donnelly KM, Brudney A, Jaffe RC. Implantation in the baboon: endometrial responses. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999;17(3):257–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1016233. (PMID: 10797944). Scott RT Jr, Ferry K, Su J, Tao X, Scott K, Treff NR. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):870–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104. (Epub 2012 Feb 2; PMID: 22305103). Moustafa S, Young SL. Diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure. F1000 Res 2020 Mar 25;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-208. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22403.1. (PMID: 32266059; PMCID: PMC7101014). Tarlatzis BC, Bosdou JK, Kolibianakis EM. What is recurrent implantation failure? In: Recurrent Implantation Failure. 2019. Kliman HJ, Frankfurter D. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):618–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.011. (PMID: 30929719). Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2. (PMID: 30518389; PMCID: PMC6282265). Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: [email protected]. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020 Mar;113(3):533–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025. (Epub 2020 Feb 27; PMID: 32115183). Dubowy RL, Feinberg RF, Keefe DL, et al. Improved endometrial assessment using cyclin E and p27. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00573-9. Kliman HJ, Honig S, Walls D, Luna M, McSweet JC, Copperman AB. Optimization of endometrial preparation results in a normal endometrial function test (EFT) and good reproductive outcome in donor ovum recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(7–8):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9061-1. Kliman HJ, McSweet JC, Grunert GM, Cardone VRS, Cadesky K, Keefe DL. The endometrial function test (EFT) directs care and predicts ART outcome. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:S17. Díaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martínez-Conejero JA, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):50-60.e615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063. Díaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):508–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.046. • Díaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Sebastian-Leon P, Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Simón C. Window of implantation transcriptomic stratification reveals different endometrial subsignatures associated with live birth and biochemical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(4):703 710.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.007. This study provides key data for the creation of the ERA biopsy. Bellver J, Simón C. Implantation failure of endometrial origin: what is new?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(4):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000468. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):818–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004. Bergh PA, Navot D. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(3):537–42. Eisman LE, Pisarska MD, Wertheimer S, et al. Clinical utility of the endometrial receptivity analysis in women with prior failed transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(3):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02041-9. Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, et al. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(4):683–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2. Simón C, Gómez C, Cabanillas S, et al. A 5-year multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing personalized, frozen and fresh blastocyst transfer in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):402–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.002. •• Riestenberg C, Kroener L, Quinn M, Ching K, Ambartsumyan G. Routine endometrial receptivity array in first embryo transfer cycles does not improve live birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:1001–6. This study shows limited utility in using ERA testing in a general infertility population. Evans-Hoeker E, Lessey BA, Jeong JW, et al. Endometrial BCL6 overexpression in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(9):1234–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116649711. Yoo JY, Kim TH, Fazleabas AT, et al. KRAS Activation and over-expression of SIRT1/BCL6 contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis and progesterone resistance. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6765. Published 2017 Jul 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04577-w Almquist LD, Likes CE, Stone B, et al. Endometrial BCL6 testing for the prediction of in vitro fertilization outcomes: a cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):1063–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.017. •• Likes CE, Cooper LJ, Efird J, et al. Medical or surgical treatment before embryo transfer improves outcomes in women with abnormal endometrial BCL6 expression. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):483–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1388-x. This study provides data to support the treatment of women with endometriosis prior to embryo transer. Lieng M, Istre O, Sandvik L, Qvigstad E. Prevalence, 1-year regression rate, and clinical significance of asymptomatic endometrial polyps: cross-sectional study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(4):465–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.005. Hinckley MD, Milki A. 1000 office-based hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: feasibility and findings. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2004;8(2):103–7. Spiewankiewicz B, Stelmachów J, Sawicki W, Cendrowski K, Wypych P, Swiderska K. The effectiveness of hysteroscopic polypectomy in cases of female infertility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003;30(1):23–5. Mittal K, Schwartz L, Goswami S, Demopoulos R. Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial polyps. International journal of gynecological pathology: official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. 1996;15(4):345–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199610000-00007. Stamatellos I, Apostolides A, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. Pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy depending on the size or number of the polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277(5):395–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0460-z. Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Iwasaki S, Kawamura T. Location of endometrial polyp and pregnancy rate in infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):180–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.072. Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, Engels V. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(6):1632–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh822. Isikoglu, M., Berkkanoglu, M., Senturk, Z., Coetzee, K., & Ozgur, K. Endometrial polyps smaller than 1.5 cm do not affect ICSI outcome. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2006;12(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60861-9 Verkauf BS. Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55128-0. Bulun SE. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1344–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1209993. Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;22(2):106–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590600604673. Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1215–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):2027–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.029. Hambartsoumian E. Endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) as a possible cause of unexplained infertility and multiple failures of implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;39(2):137–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00345.x. Bulletti C, Ziegler DE, Levi Setti D, Cicinelli P, Polli E, Stefanetti V, Myomas M. Pregnancy outcome, and in vitro fertilization. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1335.010 Johnson G, MacLehose RF, Baird DD, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Hartmann KE. Uterine leiomyomata and fecundability in the Right from the Start study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(10):2991–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des263. Unlu C, Celik O, Celik N, Otlu B. Expression of endometrial receptivity genes increase after myomectomy of intramural leiomyomas not distorting the endometrial cavity. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115612929. Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz049. Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, Bracco B, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):964–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu041. Benaglia L, Cardellicchio L, Leonardi M, et al. Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(5):606–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.07.021. Guo S, Li Z, Yan L, Sun Y, Feng Y. GnRH agonist improves pregnancy outcome in mice with induced adenomyosis by restoring endometrial receptivity. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:1621–31. Published 2018 Jun 7. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S162541 Fischer CP, Kayisili U, Taylor HS. HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1133–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.060. Niu Z, Chen Q, Sun Y, Feng Y. Long-term pituitary downregulation before frozen embryo transfer could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(12):1026–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.824960. Park CW, Choi MH, Yang KM, Song IO. Pregnancy rate in women with adenomyosis undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43(3):169–73. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.169. Tan J, Moriarty S, Taskin O, et al. Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for focal and diffuse adenomyosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):608–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.020. Cicinelli E, De Ziegler D, Nicoletti R, et al. Chronic endometritis: correlation among hysteroscopic, histologic, and bacteriologic findings in a prospective trial with 2190 consecutive office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):677–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.074. Vitagliano A, Saccardi C, Litta PS, Noventa M. Chronic endometritis: really so relevant in repeated IVF failure?. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12758 Di Pietro C, Cicinelli E, Guglielmino MR, et al. Altered transcriptional regulation of cytokines, growth factors, and apoptotic proteins in the endometrium of infertile women with chronic endometritis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(5):509–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12076. Wu D, Kimura F, Zheng L, et al. Chronic endometritis modifies decidualization in human endometrial stromal cells. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):16. Published 2017 Mar 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0233-x Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R, et al. Chronic endometritis due to common bacteria is prevalent in women with recurrent miscarriage as confirmed by improved pregnancy outcome after antibiotic treatment. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(5):640–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113508817. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of Interest The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain and studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Bakkensen, J.B., Agarwal, R. & Shapiro, M. Recent Advances and Current Perspectives on Endometrial Receptivity. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 10, 45–52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-021-00313-4 Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-021-00313-4