Prospective evaluation of luteal phase length and natural fertility.

OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of a short luteal phase on fecundity.DesignProspective time-to-pregnancy cohort study.SettingNot applicable.Patient(s)Women trying to conceive, ages 30-44 years, without known infertility.Intervention(s)Daily diaries, ovulation prediction testing, standardized pregnancy testing.Main outcome measure(s)Subsequent cycle fecundity.Result(s)Included in the analysis were 1,635 cycles from 284 women. A short luteal phase (≤11 days including the day of ovulation) occurred in 18% of observed cycles. Mean luteal phase length was 14 days. Significantly more women with a short luteal phase were smokers. After adjustment for age, women with a short luteal phase had 0.82 times the odds of pregnancy in the subsequent cycle immediately following the short luteal phase compared with women without a short luteal phase. Women with a short luteal length in the first observed cycle had significantly lower fertility after the first 6 months of pregnancy attempt, but at 12 months there was no significant difference in cumulative probability of pregnancy.Conclusion(s)Although an isolated cycle with a short luteal phase may negatively affect short-term fertility, incidence of infertility at 12 months was not significantly higher among these women.Clinical trial registration numberNCT01028365.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-10T06:07:26.400732+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00