Percutaneous Imaging-guided Cryoablation of Endometriosis Scars of the Anterior Abdominal Wall

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 12 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-04

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation for treating endometriosis scars in the anterior abdominal wall.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation for the management of anterior abdominal wall endometriosis. DESIGN: Patients with abdominal wall endometriosis underwent percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation and had a 6-month follow-up. SETTING: Data dealing with patients' and anterior abdominal wall endometriosis (AAWE) characteristics, cryoablation, and clinical and radiologic outcomes were retrospectively collected and analyzed. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent cryoablation from June 2020 to September 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions were performed under US/computed tomography (CT) guidance or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. Cryoprobes were directly inserted into the AAWE, and cryoablation was performed with a single 5 to 10 minute freezing cycle, which was stopped when the iceball expanded 3 to 5 mm beyond AAWE borders as assessed on intra-procedural cross-sectional imaging. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen patients (15/29; 51.7%) had prior endometriosis, 28 (28/29; 95.5%) had previous cesarian section, and 22 (22/29; 75.9%) referred association between symptoms and menses. Cryoablation was performed under local (16/29; 55.2%) or general anesthesia (13/29; 44.8%) and mainly in an out-patient basis (18/20; 62%). There was only one (1/29; 3.5%) minor procedure-related complication. Complete symptom relief was recorded in 62.1% (18/29) and 72.4% (21/29) patients at 1 and 6 months, respectively. In the whole population, pain significantly dropped at 6 months compared to the baseline (1.1 ± 2.3; range 0-8 vs 7.1 ± 1.9; range 3-10; p <.05). Eight (8/29; 27.6%) patients presented residual symptoms at 6 months, and 4 (4/29; 13.8%) had an MRI-confirmed residual/recurring disease. Contrast-enhanced MRI obtained for the first 14 (14/29; 48.3%) patients of the series, all without signs of residual/recurring disease, demonstrated a significantly smaller ablation area compared to the baseline volume of the AAWE (1.0 cm3 ± 1.4; range 0-4.7; vs 11.1 ± 9.9 cm3; range 0.6-36.4; p <.05). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation of AAWE is safe and clinically effective in achieving pain relief.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:10:56.557307+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:09:59.534508+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK