Diagnostic evaluations and management of surgical scar endometriosis: a case series of 13 cases over 9 years

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024 · vol. 13(4) , pp. 1025–1032 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240807 · W4393315351
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10

This case series reviewed 13 patients with scar endometriosis, finding MRI suggestive of diagnosis, histopathology definitive, and surgical excision the treatment of choice.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This paper reports diagnostic evaluations and management of surgical scar endometriosis in 13 women identified over 9 years, focusing on incisional site endometrioma presenting as cyclical pain and a mass in the 2nd to 3rd decade after prior surgery. Ultrasonography was hypoechoic but inconclusive in most cases, whereas MRI was suggestive of diagnosis in almost all cases, and definitive confirmation relied on histopathological examination. All patients underwent surgical excision (with wide excision described as 1 cm around the mass), and three received hormonal therapy beforehand, with the caveat that medical treatment provided only temporary symptomatic pain relief while hormone effects lasted. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically surgical scar (incisional site) endometriosis and how it is diagnosed and treated.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is defined as localization of ectopic functional endometrial gland and stroma. Scar endometriosis is a rare benign gynecological disease affecting women in the reproductive age group. It’s incidence in post-caesarean and post-hysterotomy scar tissue is approximately 0.03-0.4% and 1.08-2% respectively. This case series reviews literature of medical data of 13 patients who presented over 9 years with incisional site endometrioma, diagnostic approaches and treatment is discussed. The patients presented in 2nd to 3rd decade of life with complaints of cyclical pain and mass at previous surgery scar. Ultrasonography (USG) detected hypoechoic mass/granuloma and inconclusive in most cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) though was suggestive of diagnosis in almost all cases. Definitive diagnosis was histopathological examination. Treatment was achieved with surgical excision in all patients, and 3 are preceded by hormonal treatment. Medical treatment can only yield symptomatic relief in pain till the hormone effect lasts. Treatment of choice is wide excision that is excision of 1 cm tissue around the mass. Endometriosis in operative site scar tissue may present as a discrete mass which may be painful and can be confused clinically with a variety of surgical conditions. It is extremely important to recognize the condition so as to avoid potential clinical pitfalls in the diagnosis of this treatable entity.
Full text 2,939 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Diagnostic evaluations and management of surgical scar endometriosis: a case series of 13 cases over 9 years DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240807Keywords: Surgical site cyclical pain, Incisional site endometrioma, Wide excisionAbstract Endometriosis is defined as localization of ectopic functional endometrial gland and stroma. Scar endometriosis is a rare benign gynecological disease affecting women in the reproductive age group. It’s incidence in post-caesarean and post-hysterotomy scar tissue is approximately 0.03-0.4% and 1.08-2% respectively. This case series reviews literature of medical data of 13 patients who presented over 9 years with incisional site endometrioma, diagnostic approaches and treatment is discussed. The patients presented in 2nd to 3rd decade of life with complaints of cyclical pain and mass at previous surgery scar. Ultrasonography (USG) detected hypoechoic mass/granuloma and inconclusive in most cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) though was suggestive of diagnosis in almost all cases. Definitive diagnosis was histopathological examination. Treatment was achieved with surgical excision in all patients, and 3 are preceded by hormonal treatment. Medical treatment can only yield symptomatic relief in pain till the hormone effect lasts. Treatment of choice is wide excision that is excision of 1 cm tissue around the mass. Endometriosis in operative site scar tissue may present as a discrete mass which may be painful and can be confused clinically with a variety of surgical conditions. It is extremely important to recognize the condition so as to avoid potential clinical pitfalls in the diagnosis of this treatable entity. Metrics References Çöl C, Yilmaz EE. Cesarean scar endometrioma: Case series. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2(5):133-6. Gupta P, Gupta S. Scar Endometriosis: Case Report with Literature Review. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(12):793-5. Francica G, Giardiello C, Angelone G, Cristiano S, Finelli R, Tramontano G. Abdominal wall endometriomas near cesarean delivery scars: sonographic and color doppler findings in a series of 12 patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(10):1041-7. Balleyguier C, Chapron C, Chopin N. Abdominal wall and surgical scar endometriosis. Results of magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(4):220-4. Wolf GC, Singh KB. Cesarean scar endometriosis: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44(2):89-95. Ashfaq R, Molberg KH, Vuitch F. Cutaneous endometriosis as a diagnostic pitfall of fine needle aspiration biopsy. A report of three cases. Acta Cytol. 1994;38(4):577-81. Rivlin ME, Das SK, Patel RB, Meeks GR. Leuprolide acetate in the management of cesarean scar endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(5):838-9. Sumathy S, Mangalakanthi J, Purushothaman K, Sharma D, Remadevi C, Sreedhar S. Symptomatology and Surgical Perspective of Scar Endometriosis: A Case Series of 16 Women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017;67(3):218-23.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (6)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK