The Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Pelvic Pain

Fred M. Howard
In: Chronic Pelvic Pain · 2011 · pp. 7–28 · doi:10.1002/9781444391855.ch2 · W1525535387
Review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Chronic pelvic pain, a common but complex condition, requires a differential diagnosis to identify contributing disorders and pain generators, including neurologic conditions like neuropathic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) has a prevalence in the general population of 15%, and in about 4% of all women is of sufficient severity to cause them to seek medical care. In spite of being a common condition, the evaluation of CPP remains a complex and perplexing diagnostic problem. The differential diagnosis in CPP should be directed toward identifying not only potential etiologic diseases, but also any disorders that may contribute to CPP ("pain generators"). It is important during the diagnostic evaluation to recognize that pain itself may be a diagnosis due to neurologic disorders such as neuropathic pain and centralization.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (21)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK