Psychosomatic aspects of vulvodynia. Comparison with the chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

In: The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1999 · vol. 44(5) , pp. 411–6 · PMID:10360252 · W2417574016
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study compared 67 vulvodynia patients and 97 chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients to controls, finding CPPS patients had higher somatization, and both patient groups were more depressed than controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine psychosomatic aspects of vulvodynia (VD) in comparison with the chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-seven VD patients and 97 CPPS patients were examined with psychological tests (Freiburg Personality Inventory, Giessen Test) and compared with a control group of 34 healthy women. Sociodemographic data and psychoanalytic diagnoses were collected for 36 VD patients and 106 CPPS patients (inpatients). Descriptive statistics, chi 2 test and multivariant analyses were used. RESULTS: CPPS patients had significantly higher somatization than VD patients (P < .004). Both CPPS and VD patients, as inpatients, were significantly more depressive than the control group. In milder forms of VD, the patients (outpatients) exhibited no depression. The incidences of sexual abuse and severe psychological disturbances were significantly higher in the CPPS group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: VD and CPPS are two, distinct psychosomatic gynecologic syndromes and indicate psychosomatically oriented therapy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (4)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK