The prospective study of laparoscopic finding in infertility cases
This prospective study evaluated 100 infertility cases using laparoscopy, revealing polycystic ovaries in 42%, tubal pathology in 33%, and uterine findings in 11%, with 20% conceiving during the study period.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective study evaluated laparoscopic findings in 100 randomly selected women with primary or secondary infertility treated at a single center in India over one year (January–December 2017). Laparoscopy identified polycystic ovaries in 42% of cases, tubal pathology in 33% (including tubal blocks on chromopertubation: cornual block in 19 cases and ampullary block in 3), uterine findings in 11%, and adhesions/obliteration in a smaller subset. During the study period, 20 women conceived, and seven had post-laparoscopic complications (shoulder pain and abdominal pain), with the paper not detailing any limitations such as lack of a comparison group. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,476 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (11)
- Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome via openalex
- Diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in work-up of female infertility via openalex
- Diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of female factor infertility via openalex
- Laparoscopic evaluation of female factors in infertility. via openalex
- Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility. via openalex
- The prospective study of laparoscopic finding in infertility cases via openalex
- W6980583568 via openalex
- W2068796004 via openalex
- W2095998027 via openalex
- W2119194086 via openalex
- W2443825621 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00