Diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in work-up of female infertility

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 6(7) , pp. 2852 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172563 · W2623873981
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study evaluated 200 infertile women, finding laparoscopy detected abnormalities in 49% and hysteroscopy in 23.5%, identifying endometriosis and tubal blockage as common laparoscopic findings.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This prospective study evaluated the role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in the infertility work-up by enrolling 200 infertile women with primary or secondary infertility and assessing findings from laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Laparoscopy detected abnormalities in 49% of cases, with the most common laparoscopic abnormalities being endometriosis (32%) and unilateral tubal lockage (24%), whereas significant hysteroscopy findings were present in 23.5% of cases, with periosteal adhesions reported as the most common hysteroscopic abnormality. The paper concludes the approach is safe and cost-effective for identifying certain tubo-peritoneal and intrauterine pathologies that may be missed by other imaging modalities, while the main limitation explicitly stated is that the study is limited to findings within this single prospective cohort (200 women) during one year of recruitment. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports endometriosis as the most common laparoscopic abnormality in women undergoing hystero-laparoscopic evaluation for infertility.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a growing concern of the society. In many cases the exact cause of infertility may not be elucidated, whether it is tubal, ovarian, uterine, or a combination of factors. This paper aims to understand the role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in evaluation of cases of infertility.Methods: This prospective study included 200 infertile women and it was conducted at department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MGM Hospital, during the period between January 2016 to December 2016. All the infertile patients either with primary or secondary infertility were included after thorough evaluation.Results: Out of 200 cases, 118(59%) patients had primary infertility and 82(41%) had secondary infertility. While laparoscopy detected abnormalities in 49% of the cases, significant hysteroscopy findings were noted in only 23.5% of cases. The most common laparoscopic abnormalities were endometriosis (32%) and unilateral tubal lockage (24%). On hysteroscopy, periosteal adhesions were the commonest abnormality in both the groups.Conclusions: Diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy is a safe and cost-effective method and should be considered when there are abnormal HSG results, a past history of pelvic infection, pelvic surgery and /or unexplained secondary infertility during management of infertile couple. Evaluation of certain significant and correctable tubo-peritoneal and intrauterine pathologies which are usually missed by other imaging modalities, can be diagnosed as well as managed in some cases by hystero-laparoscopy.
Full text 5,569 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Infertility is a growing concern of the society. In many cases the exact cause of infertility may not be elucidated, whether it is tubal, ovarian, uterine, or a combination of factors. This paper aims to understand the role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in evaluation of cases of infertility.

Methods

This prospective study included 200 infertile women and it was conducted at department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MGM Hospital, during the period between January 2016 to December 2016. All the infertile patients either with primary or secondary infertility were included after thorough evaluation.

Results

Out of 200 cases, 118(59%) patients had primary infertility and 82(41%) had secondary infertility. While laparoscopy detected abnormalities in 49% of the cases, significant hysteroscopy findings were noted in only 23.5% of cases. The most common laparoscopic abnormalities were endometriosis (32%) and unilateral tubal lockage (24%). On hysteroscopy, periosteal adhesions were the commonest abnormality in both the groups.

Conclusions

Diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy is a safe and cost-effective method and should be considered when there are abnormal HSG results, a past history of pelvic infection, pelvic surgery and /or unexplained secondary infertility during management of infertile couple. Evaluation of certain significant and correctable tubo-peritoneal and intrauterine pathologies which are usually missed by other imaging modalities, can be diagnosed as well as managed in some cases by hystero-laparoscopy. Metrics

References

Dyer SJ. International estimates on infertility prevalence and treatment seeking potential need and demand for medical care. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2379-80. Yu SL, Yap C. Investigating the Infertile Couple. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2003;32:611-4. Mohapatra P, Swain S, Pati T. Hysteroscopic tubal cannulation: our experience. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2004;54(5):498-9. Olajide AA. The role of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy and falloposcopy in tubal causes of infertility. Tropical J Laparo Endoscopy. 2010;1(1):19-23. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins;2011:1137-91. Crosignani PG, Rubin BL. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. 2000. Optimal use infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. Human Reprod. 2000;15:723-32. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment -seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506-12 Aflatoonian A, Seyedhassani SM, Tabibnejad N. The epidemiological and etiological aspects of infertility in Yazd province of Iran. Iranian J Reprod Med. 2009;7:117-22.. Rehana R, Majid SS. Aetiological factors of infertility. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2004;18:166-71. Reiter RC. Evidence based management of chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:422-35. Lessey BA, Forstein DA, Miller PB, Egbuniwe MN, Dodds R. Laparoscopic surgery improves outcome and diagnostic accuracy in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:S38. Nayak PK, Mahapatra PC, Mallick JJ, Swain S, Mitra S, Sahoo J. Role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility: A retrospective study of 300 patients. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6:32-4. Makled AK, Farghali MM, Shenouda DS. Role of hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in women with unexplained infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:187-92. Jayakrishnan K, Koshy AK, Raju R. Role of laparohysteroscopy in women with normal pelvic imaging and failed ovulation stimulation with intrauterine insemination. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010;3:20-4. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mahmoud AMA. WHO manual for the standardized investigation of the infertile couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;1993. Gomel V, McComb PF. Investigation of tubal and peritoneal causes of infertility. In: Gomel V, Brill AI, editors . Reconstructive and reproductive surgery in gynecology. 1st ed. London: Informa Healthcare. 2010:243-59. Glatstein IZ, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Practice patterns among reproductive endocrinologists: Th e infertility evaluation. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:443-51. Bosteels J, Van Herendael B, Weyers S, D’Hooghe T. Th e position of diagnostic laparoscopy in current fertility practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:477-85. Poncelet C, Bonneau C. Sifer C, Chanelles O. Interest of laparoscopy for Unexplained Infertility. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:S148-9. Capelo FO, Kumar A, Steinkampf MP, Azziz R. Laparoscopic evaluation following failure to achieve pregnancy after ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1450-3. Goldman MB, MacKenzie TA, Regan MM, Alper MM, Thornton KL, Reindollar RH. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in couples treated for unexplained infertility in the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(Suppl):S32-3. Shimizu Y, Yamaguchi W, Takashima A, Kaku S, Kita N, Murakami T. Long-term cumulative pregnancy rate in women with unexplained infertility aft er laparoscopic surgery followed by in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization alone. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:412-5. Tanahatoe S, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB. Accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the infertility work-up before intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:361-6.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (22)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK